COMBINATION OF FREEMASONS.
The combination of the Freemasons in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries to demand a higher rate of wages, which eventually gave rise to the enactment of the Statutes of Laborers, is thus described by a writer in the Gentleman's Magazine (January, 1740, page 17):
"King Edward III took so great an affection to Windsor, the place of his birth, that he instituted the Order of the Garter there, and rebuilt and enlarged the castle, with the church and chapel of Saint George. This was a great work and required a great many hands; and for the carrying of it on writs were directed to the sheriffs of several counties to send thither, under the penalty of £100 each, such a number of Masons by a day appointed. London sent forty, so did Devon, Somerset, and several other counties; but several dying of the plague, and others deserting the service, new writs were issued to send up supplies. Yorkshire sent sixty, and other counties proportionably, and orders were given that no one should entertain any of these runaway Masons, under pain of forfeiture of all their goods. Hereupon, the Masons entered into a combination not to work, unless at higher wages. They agreed upon tokens, etc., to know one another by, and to assist one another against being impressed, and not to work unless free and on their own terms. Hence they called themselves Freemasons; and this combination continued during the carrying on of these buildings for several years. The wars between the two Houses coming on in the next reign, the discontented herded together in the same manner, and the gentry also underhand supporting the malcontents, occasioned several Acts of Parliament against the combination of Masons and other persons under that denomination the titles of which Acts are still to be seen in the printed statutes of those reigns."
Ashmole, in his History of the Order of the Garter (page 80), confirms the fact of the impressment of workmen by King Edward; and the combination that followed seems but a natural consequence of this oppressive act; but the assertion that the origin of Freemasonry as an organized institution of builders is to be traced to such a combination, is not supported by the facts of history, and, indeed, the writer himself admits that the Freemasons denied its truth.
COMMANDER.
1. The presiding officer in a Commandery of Knights Templar. His style is Eminent, and the jewel of his office is a cross, from which issue rays of light. In England and Canada he is now styled Preceptor.
2. The Superintendent of a Commandery, as a house or residence of the Ancient Knights of Malta, was so called.
COMMANDER, GRAND
See Grand Commander.
COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF
The presiding officer in a Consistory of Sublime Princes of the Royal Secret in the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. His style is Illustrious. In a Grand Consistory the presiding officer is a Grand Commander-in-Chief, and he is styled Very Illustrious.
COMMANDER INSPECTOR
Seventh and last grade of the Philosophic Rite. Thory says this was arranged by the Supreme Council of the Thirty-third Degree to make up Degree Thirty-one though previously used, the Metropolitan Chapter possessing one of the same name, No. 71, eighth series.
COMMANDERY.
1. In the United States all regular assemblies of Knights Templar are called Commanderies, and must consist of the following officers: Eminent Commander, Generalissimo, Captain-General, Prelate, Senior Warden, Junior Warden, Treasurer, Recorder, Warder, Standard-Bearer, Sword Bearer, and Sentinel. These Commanderies derive their warrants of Constitution from a Grand Commandery, or, if there is no such body in the State in which they are organized, from the Grand Encampment of the United States. They confer the Degrees of Companion of the Red Cross, Knight of Malta, and Knight Templar. Under the present law of the Grand Encampment, Knight Templar of the United States, the Order of the Red Cross is conferred in the Council Chamber, the Order of Malta in a Priory and the Order of the Temple in the Asylum of the Commandery.
In a Commandery of Knights Templar, as familiar to Doctor Mackey, the throne is situated in the East. Above it are suspended three banners: the center one bearing a cross, surmounted by a glory; the left one having inscribed on it the emblems of the Order, and the right one, a paschal lamb. The Eminent Commander is seated on the throne; the Generalissimo, Prelate, and Past Commanders on his right; the Captain-General on his left; the Treasurer and Recorder, as in a Symbolic Lodge; the Senior Warden at the southwest angle of the triangle, and upon the right of the first division; the Junior Warden at the northwest angle of the triangle, and on the left of the third division; the Standard-Bearer in the West, between the Sword-Bearer on his right, and the Warder on his left; and in front of him is a stall for the initiate. The Knights are arranged in equal numbers on each side, and in front of the throne. In England and Canada a body of Knights Templar is called a Preceptory.
2. The houses or residences of the Knights of Malta were called Commanderies, and the aggregation of them in a nation was called a Priory or Grand Priory.
COMMANDERY, GRAND
When three or more Commanderies are instituted in a State, they may unite and form a Grand Commandery under the regulations prescribed by the Grand Encampment of the United States. They have the superintendence of all Commanderies of Knights Templar that are holden in their respective Jurisdictions.
A Grand Commandery meets at least annually, and its officers consist of a Grand Commander, Deputy Grand Commander, Grand Generalissimo, Grand Captain-General,~ Grand Prelate, Grand Senior and Junior Warden, Grand Treasurer, Grand Recorder, Grand Warder, Grand Standard-Bearer, and Grand Sword-Bearer.
COMMITTEE
To facilitate the transaction of business, a Lodge or Grand Lodge often refers a subject to a particular committee for investigation and report. By the usages of Freemasonry, committees of this character are always appointed by the presiding officer; and the Master of a Lodge, when present at the meeting of a committee, may act, if he thinks proper, as its chairman; for the Master presides over any assemblage of the Craft in his Jurisdiction.
COMMITTEE GENERAL
By the Constitution of the Grand Lodge of England, all matters of business to be brought under the consideration of the Grand Lodge must previously be presented to a General Committee, consisting of the President of the Board of Benevolence, the Present and Past Grand Officers, and the Master of every regular Lodge, who meet on the fourteenth day immediately preceding each quarterly communication. No such regulation prevails among the Grand Lodge of America.
COMMITTEE OF CHARITY
In most Lodges there is a standing Committee of Charity, appointed at the beginning of the year, to which, in general, applications for relief are referred by the Lodge. In cases where the Lodge does not itself take immediate action, the committee is also invested with the power to grant relief to a limited amount during the recess of the Lodge.
COMMITTEE OF FINANCE
In many Lodges the Master, Wardens, Treasurer, and Secretary constitute a Committee of Finance, to which is referred the general supervision of the finances of the Lodge.
COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN CORRESPONDENCE
In none of the Grand Lodges of this country up to early in the eighteenth century, was such a committee as that on foreign correspondence ever appointed. A few of them had corresponding secretaries, to whom were entrusted the duty of attending to the correspondence of the Body; a duty which was very generally neglected. A report on the proceedings of other Bodies was altogether unknown. Grand Lodges met and transacted the local business of their own Jurisdictions without any reference to what was passing abroad.
But improvements in this respect began to show themselves. Intelligent Freemasons saw that it would no longer do to isolate themselves from the Fraternity in other countries, and that, if any moral or intellectual advancement was to be expected, it must be derived from the intercommunication and collision of ideas; and the first step toward this advancement was the appointment in every Grand Lodge of a committee whose duty it should be to collate the proceedings of other Jurisdictions, and to eliminate from them the most important items. These committees were, however, very slow in assuming the functions which devolved upon them, and in coming up to the full measure of their duties. At first their reports were little more than "reports of progress." No light was derived from their collation, and the Bodies which had appointed them were no wiser after their reports had been read than they were before.
As a specimen of the first condition and subsequent improvement of these committees oil foreign correspondence, let us take at random the transactions of any Grand Lodge old enough to have a history and intelligent enough to have made any progress; and, for this purpose, the proceedings of the Grand Lodge of Ohio, two volumes of which lie conveniently at hand, will do as well as any other.
The Grand Lodge of Ohio was organized in January, 1803. From that time to 1829, its proceedings contain no reference to a committee on correspondence; and except a single allusion to the Washington Convention, made in the report of a special committee, the Freemasons of Ohio seem to have had no cognizance, or at least to have shown no recognition, of any Freemasonry which might be outside of their own Jurisdiction.
But in the year 1830, for the first time, a committee was appointed to report on the foreign correspondence of the Grand Lodge. This committee bore the title of the Committee on Communications from Foreign Grand Lodges, etc., and made during the session a report of eight lines in length, which contained just the amount of information that could be condensed in that brief space, and no more. In 1831, the report was fifteen lines long; in 1832, ten lines; in 1833, twelve lines; and so on for several years, the reports being sometimes a little longer and sometimes a little shorter; but the length being always measured by lines, and not by pages, until, in 1837, there was a marked falling off, the report consisting only of one line and a half. Of this report, which certainly cannot be accused of verbosity, the following is an exact copy: "Nothing has been presented for the consideration of your committee requiring the action of the Grand Lodge."
In 1842 the labors of the committee began to increase, and their report fills a page of the proceedings. Things now rapidly improved. In 1843, the report was three pages long; in 1845, four pages; in 1846, seven, in 1848, nearly thirteen; and 1853, fourteen; in 1856, thirty; and in 1857, forty-six. Thenceforward there is no more fault to be found. The reports of the future committees were of full growth, and we do not again find such an unmeaning phrase as "nothing requiring the action of the Grand Lodge."
The history of these reports in other Grand Lodges is the same as that in Ohio. Beginning with a few lines which announced the absence of all matters worthy of consideration, they have grown up to the full stature of elaborate essays in which the most important and interesting subjects of Masonic history, philosophy, and jurisprudence are discussed, generally with much ability.
At this day the reports of the committees on foreign
correspondence in all the Grand Lodges of this country
constitute an important portion of the literature of
the Institution. The chairmen of these committees -
for the other members fill, for the most part, only the
post of "sleeping partners" - are generally men of
education and talent, who, by the very occupation in
which they are employed, of reading the published
proceedings of all the Grand Lodges in correspondence
with their own, have become thoroughly conversant
with the contemporary history of the Order, while a
great many of them have extended their studies in its
previous history.
The Reportorial Corps, as these hard-laboring Brethren are beginning to call themselves, exercise, of
course, a not trifling influence in the Order. These
committees annually submit to their respective Grand
Lodges a mass of interesting information, which is
read with great avidity by their Brethren. Gradually
- for at first it was not their custom - they have added
to the bare narration of facts their comments on Masonic law and their criticisms on the decisions made in
other Jurisdictions. These comments and critic
have very naturally their weight, sometimes beyond
their actual worth; and it will therefore be proper
to take a glance at what ought to be the character of
a report on foreign correspondence.
In the first place, then, a reporter of foreign correspondence should be, in the most literal sense of Shakespeare's words, a brief chronicler of the times. His report
should contain a succinct account of everything of
importance that is passing in the Masonic world, so
far as his materials supply him with the information.
But, remembering that he is writing for the instruction
of hundreds, perhaps thousands, many of whom cannot spare much time, and many others who have no
inclination to spare it, he should eschew the sin of tediousness, never forgetting that "brevity is the soul
of wit." He should omit all details that have no
special interest; should husband his space for important items, and be exceedingly parsimonious in the use
of unnecessary expletives, whose only use is to add to
the length of a line. In a word, he should remember
that he is not an orator but a historian. A rigid adherence to these principles would save the expense of
many printed pages to his Grand Lodge, and the waste
of much time to his readers. These reports will form
the germ of future Masonic history The collected
mass will be an immense one, and it should not be unnecessarily enlarged by the admission of trivial items
In the next place, although we admit that these, Brethren of the reportorial corps" have peculiar advantages in reading the opinions of their contemporaries on subjects of Masonic jurisprudence, they
would be mistaken in supposing that these advantages
must necessarily make them Masonic lawyers. Ex
quovis ligno non fit Mercurius, meaning in Latin, a
Mercury (the Roman god of commerce) is not to be
made out of any chance piece of wood. It is not every
man that will make a lawyer. A peculiar turn of mind
and a habit of close reasoning, as well as a thorough
acquaintance with the law itself, are required to fit one
for the investigation of questions of jurisprudence.
Reporters, therefore, should assume the task of adjudicating points of law with much diffidence. They
should not pretend to make decision ex cathedra (officially or with authority, from the Latin, meaning literally from the bishop's throne or the professor's chair), but only to express an opinion; and that opinion they should attempt to sustain by arguments that may convince their readers. Dogmatism is entirely out of place in a Masonic report on foreign correspondence.
But if tediousness and dogmatism are displeasing, how much more offensive must be rudeness and personality. Courtesy is a Masonic as well as a knightly virtue, and the reporter who takes advantage of his official position to speak rudely of his Brethren, or makes his report the vehicle of scurrility and abuse, most strangely forgets the duty and respect which he owes to the Grand Lodge which he represents and the Fraternity to which he addresses himself.
And, lastly, a few words as to style. These reports, we have already said, constitute an important feature of Masonic literature. It should be, then, the object and aim of everyone to give to them a tone and character which shall reflect honor on the society whence they emanate, and enhance the reputation of their authors. The style cannot always be scholarly, but it should always be chaste; it may sometimes want eloquence, but it should never be marked by vulgarity. Coarseness of language and slang phrases are manifestly out of place in a paper which treats of subjects such as naturally belong to a Masonic document. Wit and humor we would not, of course, exclude. The Horatian maxim bids us sometimes to unbend, and old Menander thought it would not do always to appear wise. Even the solemn Johnson could sometimes perpetrate a joke, and Sidney Smith has enlivened his lectures on moral philosophy with numerous witticisms. There are those who delight in the stateliness of Coleridge; but for ourselves we do not object to the levity of Lamb, though we would not care to descend to the vulgarity of Rabelais.
To sum up the whole matter in a few words, these reports on foreign correspondence should be succinct, and, if you please, elaborate chronicles of all passing events in the Masonic world; they should express the opinions of their authors on points of Masonic law, not as judicial dicta (Latin, verdicts), but simply as opinions, not to be dogmatically enforced, but to be sustained and supported by the best arguments that the writers can produce; they should not be made the vehicles of personal abuse or vituperation; and, lastly, they should be clothed in language worthy of the literature of the Order.
COMMITTEE, PRIVATE
The well-known regulation which forbids private committees in the Lodge, that is, select conversations between two or more members, in which the other members are not permitted to join, is derived from the Old Charges: "You are not to hold private committees or separate conversation, without leave from the Master, nor to talk of anything impertinent or unseemly, nor to interrupt the Master or Wardens, or any brother speaking to the Master" (see Constitutions, 1723, page 53).
COMMITTEE, REPORT OF
See Report of a Committee.
COMITY, LODGE AND GRAND LODGE
Contrary to a popular misunderstanding etymologists
do not derive comity from such roots as co or com (as in cooperation
and committee) but from an old and little used Latin word for
friendliness, the means of friendliness, friendly relations.
The word belongs to the technical nomenclature
of Freemasonry, and is one of the subjects in Masonic jurisprudence.
It is the name for that set of means by which Masonic local bodies
and Masonic Grand Bodies work in friendly co-operation with each
other, within and among the recognized Rites. Comity is in two
major divisions:
Internal, by which Lodges cooperate with
each other and with their Grand Lodge (or Chapters, Councils,
etc.) within the same Grand Jurisdiction; External, the means
by which Grand Lodges (Grand Chapters, Grand Councils, etc.) cooperate
with other Grand Lodges, either at home or abroad.
I. INTERNAL COMITY
The means employed are in part departments
or offices of Lodges and Grand Lodges, in part are voluntary activities
initiated, encouraged, or sponsored by Lodges and Grand Lodges.
Among these are : District Deputy systems; District Grand Lecturer
Systems; Masonic periodicals; group or area assemblies of Lodges;
"service committees" or departments for Masonic education,
employment, and speakers bureaus, etc. The reception of visitors,
the visiting of one Lodge by another, conferring of Degrees by
courtesy, the right of demission (or dimission) are among the
means of internal comity provided for in the Ancient Landmarks.
II. EXTERNAL COMITY
The complete system of External Comity is
as yet in the making; thus far such methods as the following have
been adopted .by each and every Grand Lodge or by a group of them:
Official recognition of one Grand Lodge by another. The exchange
of Grand Representatives. Foreign (or Fraternal) Correspondence
Reports in Grand Lodge Proceedings. The visiting of a Grand Lodge
by official representatives of another. Correspondence among Grand
Masters and Grand Secretaries. Annual Conferences by Grand Masters,
and by Grand Secretaries. Conferring of Courtesy Degrees. Demission
or visiting from one Grand Jurisdiction to another. The Masonic
Service Association, and similar voluntary service activities.
Periodicals of general circulation. Extra-Grand
Jurisdictional services of Grand Lodge Libraries. Books, booklets,
movies, etc., of one Grand Jurisdiction permitted for use in another.
The sending of Masonic Committees and missions abroad. The exchange
of Grand Lodge Proceedings. Etc., etc.
General agreement on some essentials of
External Comity is still incomplete. Among these are: Specific
conditions on which to grant official recognition to their Grand
Bodies. Grand Lodge responsibility for constituting and fostering
Lodges in foreign countries not already under any Grand Lodge.
The true and correct Grand Lodge procedure in other countries
in cases where general Masonic organization has broken down but
where there are some (at least) regular Masons and Lodges. (As
in Italy in the 1930's.)
The attempt to set up a single General,
or National, Grand Lodge which began during the Revolutionary
War and was not abandoned until after the Civil War was predicated
upon the known need for ways and means to enable thousands of
American Masonic Bodies and Grand Bodies to work in unity and
harmony, lest the American Craft become intellectual by breaking
down into self-contained, isolated, mutually exclusive local groups.
That need was real but as events have proved a single American
Grand Lodge could not have been the satisfaction of it; the body
of means and methods which in purpose and practice comprise Comity
are more extensive, more free, more adaptable, more satisfying,
and more effectual than the means and methods of one Grand Lodge
could have been. The system of Comity has given to American Freemasonry
everything that a National Grand Lodge could have given to it;
and it has given to it many things that a National Grand Lodge
would have denied to it.
The Mother Grand Lodge of Speculative Freemasonry
was set up in 1717 after it had been discussed by already-existing,
self-constituted Lodges in London; though only four of them attended
and elected the first Grand Master it is certain that others had
consented and, as their actions proved, were ready to unite. In
the beginning this Grand Lodge was for no purpose except to revive
a general assembly, and to give the Lodges a center where they
might occasionally meet. It was an act of comity. There was to
be no new Freemasonry ; there was to be a means for the old Freemasonry
to work more effectually.
There were many pre-1717 Lodges in England,
Ireland, and Scotland; in Scotland alone there were more than
100 before 1700. When a new Lodge was formed (usually of seven
or more) it was self-constituted by men who already were Masons,
one from a Lodge in one place, another from a Lodge in another,
and they thus had ties with other Lodges from the beginning. Each
Lodge had a copy of the same old Charges that other Lodges possessed,
or it had men in it who knew the essential portions by heart.
A Lodge might assist a group to form a Lodge in a nearby community,
help it during its formative period, and afterwards maintain close
ties with it; these were daughter Lodges. Any Mason regularly
made, possessed of the all-important modes of recognition, could
visit in any Lodge. This was their comity, the means by which,
before a Grand Lodge system was devised, separate and independent
Lodges formed a single Fraternity.
COMMON GAVEL
See Gavel.
COMMON JUDGE
Found in some early writings upon Freemasonry and probably meant for Common Gauge.
COMMUNICATION
The meeting of a Lodge is so called. There is a peculiar significance in this term. To communicate, which, in the Old English form, was to cutamon, originally meant to share in common with others. The great sacrament of the Christian Church, which denotes a participation in the mysteries of the religion and a fellowship in the church, is called a communion, which is fundamentally the same as a communication, for he who partakes of the communion is said to communicate. Hence the meetings of Masonic Lodges are called communications, to signify that it is not simply the ordinary meeting of a society for the transaction of business, but that such meeting is the fellowship of men engaged in a common pursuit, and governed by a common principle, and that there is therein a communication or participation of those feelings and sentiments that constitute a true brotherhood.
The communications of Lodges are regular or stated and special or emergent. Regular communications are held under the provision of the by-laws, but special communications are called by order of the Master. It is a regulation that no special communication can alter, amend, or rescind the proceedings of a regular communication.
COMMUNICATION, GRAND
The meeting of a Grand Lodge.
COMMUNICATION OF DEGREES
When the peculiar mysteries of a Degree are bestowed upon a candidate by mere verbal description of the bestower, without his being made to pass through the constituted ceremonies, the Degree is technically said to be communicated. This mode is, however, entirely confined in America to the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite.
The Degrees may in that Rite be thus conferred in any place where secrecy is secured; but the prerogative of communicating is restricted to the presiding officers of Bodies of the Rite, who may communicate certain of the Degrees upon candidates who have been previously duly elected, and to Inspectors and Deputy Inspectors-General of the Thirty-third Degree, who may communicate all the Degrees of the Rite, except the last, to any persons whom they may deem qualified to receive them.
COMMUNICATION, QUARTERLY
Anciently Grand Lodges, which were then called General Assemblies of the Craft, were hold annually. But it is said that the Grand Master Inigo Jones instituted quarterly communications at the beginning of the seventeenth century, which were continued by his successors, the Earl of Pembroke and Sir Christopher Wren, until the infirmities of the latter compelled him to neglect them (see Constitutions, 1738, page 99). On the revival in 1717, provision was made for the resumption; and in the twelfth of the thirty-nine Regulations of 1721 it was declared that the Grand Lodge must have a quarterly communication about Michaelmas, Christmas and Lady-Day (see Constitutions, 1723, page 61). These quarterly communications are still retained by the Grand Lodge of England, and in America by the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts, but all other American Grand Lodges have adopted the old system of annual communications.
COMMUNION OF THE BRETHREN
See Bread, Consecrated.
COMO
Capital of the Province of Como in Northern Italy, situated at South end of West branch of Lake of Como, about thirty miles from Milan, and today is an industrial city. Its interest to Freemasons is on account of it being the center from which radiated the Comacine Masters, who descended from the Roman Colleges of Artificers and who built for the Lombards and others during their reign and carried their Art and influence into the Cathedral building of the Renaissance (see Comacine Masters).
The archeologists have determined the form of the older city of Roman times to have been rectangular, enclosed by walls. Towers were constructed on walls in the twelfth century. Portions of the walls are now to be seen in the garden of Liceo Volta. Baths common in all Roman cities have been discovered. Fortifications erected previous to 1127 were largely constructed with Roman inscribed sepulchral urns and other remains, in which most all Roman cities were unusually rich.
It is usual to record that Como was the birthplace of the elder and younger Pliny. The younger Pliny had a villa here called Comedia and was much interested in building the city, having founded baths, a library, and aided in charity for the support of orphan children.
Of the many letters of the younger Pliny that remain, one is to his builder, Mustio, a Comacine architect, commissioning him to restore the ternple of the Eleusinian Ceres, in which, after explaining the form of design he wished it to take, he concludes: "... at least, unless you think of something better, you, whose Art can always overcome difficulties of position."
There was an early church of Saints Peter and Paul in the fifth century that stood outside of the town and the site is now occupied by the Romanesque church of Saint Abbondio, founded 1013, and consecrated 1095. There are found many interesting intrecci remains of early carvings of the Comacine or Solomon's Knot
On a site of an earlier church stands the present Cathedral of Como, which is built entirely of marble.
It was begun in 1396 A.D., but was altered in the period from 1487-1526 A.D., into Renaissance. Authors disagree as to whether the church was restored or rebuilt. The faqade, 1457-86 A.D., follows in its lines the old Lombard form, but the dividing pilasters are lavishly enriched, being perpendicular niches with a statue in each.
Scott says that "During the years from 1468 to 1492 the books of the Lodge, preserved in the archivei, abound in names of Magistri from the neighborhood of Como, both architects and sculptors, and among them was Tommaso Rodari, who entered the lodge in 1490, with a letter of recommendation from the Duke, advising that he be specially trained in the Art of Sculpture. He and four others were sent to Rome to remain ten years, and perfect themselves in sculpture, to study the antique, and to return to the laborerium as fully qualified masters." Rodlari returned and sculptured a most beautiful 'North door of the Cathedral in rich ornate Renaissance style, although the lions are still under the columns, thus preserving a Cornacine symbol so universally common in earlier times of pure Lombard style.
The history of Como as a city with her famous fortunes and defeats during the invasions of barbrians and her long conflicts with her old enemy, Milan, may be found elsewhere. What interests us is the eariy colonization by Rome and her subsequent relations to Architecture at the Renaissance.
Soon after 89 B.C. Rome sent 3,000 colonist to Como, and Artificers were certainly among them, and in 59 B.C. Caesar sent 5,000 more, and the place received the name Novum comum and received Latin rights (see Comacine Masters).
COMPAGNON
In French Freemasonry, a Fellow Craft is so called, and the grade du Compagnon is the Degree of Fellow Craft.
COMPAGNONAGE
This is the name which is given in France
to certain mystical associations formed between workmen of the
same or an analogous handicraft, whose object is to afford mutual
assistance to the members. It was at one time considered among
handicraftsmen as the Second Degree of the novitiate, before arriving
at the maitrise, or mastership, the first being, of course, that
of apprentice; and workmen were admitted into it only after five
years of apprenticeship, and on the production of a skillfully
constructed piece of work, which was called their chef-d'oeuvre
(the French for masterpiece).
Tradition gives to Compage a Hebraic origin,
which to some extent assimilates it to the traditional history
of Freemasonry as springing out of the Solomonic Temple. It is,
however, certain that it arose, in the twelfth century, out of
a part of the corporation of workmen. These, who prosecuted the
labors of their Craft from province to province, could not shut
their eyes to the narrow policy of the gilds or corporations,
which the masters were constantly seeking to make more exclusive.
Thence they perceived the necessity of forming
for themselves associations or confratemities, whose protection
should accompany them in all their laborious wanderings, and secure
to them employment and fraternal intercourse when arriving in
strange towns.
The Compagnons du Tour, which has been the
title assumed by those who are the members of the brotherhoods
of Compagnonage, have legends, which have been traditionally transmitted
from age to age, by which, like the Freemasons, they trace the
origin of their association to the Temple of King Solomon.
These legends are three in number, for the
different societies of Compagnonage recognize three different
founders, and hence made three different associations , which
are:
1. The Children of Solomon.
2. The Children of Maître Jacques,
3. The Children of Pére Soubise.
These three societies or classes of the
Compagnons are irreconcilable enemies and reproach each other
with the imaginary contests of their supposed founders.
The Children of Solomon pretend that King
Solomon gave them their devoir, or gild, as a reward for their
labors at the Temple, and that he had there limited them into
a brotherhood. The Children of Maître Jacques (the French
name for Master James), say that their founder, who was the son
of a celebrated architect named Jacquain, or Jacques, was one
of the chief Masters of Solomon, and a colleague of Hiram. He
was born in a small city of Gaul named Carte, and now St. Romille,
but which we should in vain look for on the maps.
From the age of fifteen he was employed
in stone cutting. He traveled in Greece, where he learned sculpture
and architecture; afterward went to Egypt, and thence to Jerusalem,
where he constructed two pillars with so much skill that he was
immediately received as a Master of the Craft. Maître Jacques
and his colleague Pére Soubise, after the labors of the
Temple were completed, resolved to go together to Gaul, swearing
that they would never separate; but the union did not last very
long in consequence of the jealousy excited in Pére Soubise
by the ascendency of Maître Jacques over their disciples.
They parted, and the former landed at Bordeaux, and the latter
at Marseilles. One day, Maître Jacques, being far away from
his disciples, was attacked by ten of those of Pére Soubise.
To save himself, he fled into a marsh, where he sustained himself
from sinking by holding on to the reeds, and was eventually rescued
by his disciples. He then retired to St. Baume, but being soon
after betrayed by a disciple, named, according to some, Jeron,
and according to others, Jamais, he was assassinated by five blows
of a dagger, in the forty-seventh year of his age, four years
and nine days after his departure from Jerusalem. On his robe
was subsequently found a reed which he wore in memory of his having
been saved in the marsh, and thenceforth his disciples adopted
the reed as the emblem of their Order.
Pére Soubise is not generally accused
of having taken any part in the assassination. The tears which
he shed over the tomb of his colleague removed in part the suspicions
which had at first rested on him. The traitor who committed the
crime, subsequently, in a moment of deep contrition, cast himself
into a well, which the disciples of Maître Jacques filled
up with stones. The relics of the martyr were long preserved in
a sacred chest, and, when his disciples afterward separated into
different crafts, his hat was given to the hatters, his tunic
to the stone-cutters, his sandals to the locksmiths, his mantle
to the joiners, his girdle to the carpenters, and his staff to
the cartwrights.
According to another tradition, Maître
Jacques was no other than Jacques de Molay, the last Grand Master
of the Templars, who had collected under his banner some of the
Children of Solomon that had separated from the parent society,
and who, about 1268 A.D., conferred upon them a new devoir or
gild.
Pére Soubise is said, in the same
legend, to have been a Benedictine monk, who gave to the carpenters
some special statutes. This second legend is generally recognized
as more truthful than the first. From this it follows that the
division of the society of Compagnonage into three classes dates
from the thirteenth century, and that the Children of Maître
Jacques and of Pére Soubise are more modern than the Children
of Solomon, from whom they were a dismemberment.
The organization of these associations of
Compagnonage reminds one very strongly of the somewhat similar
organization of the Stonemasons of Germany and of other countries
in the Middle Ages. To one of these classes every handicraftsman
in France was expected to attach himself. There was an initiation,
and a system of Degrees which were four in number: the Accepted
Companion, the Finished Companion, the Initiated Companion, and,
lastly, the Affiliated Companion. There were also signs and words
as modes of recognition, and decorations, which varied in the
several devoirs; but to all, the square and compasses was a common
symbol.
As soon as a Craftsman had passed through
his apprenticeship, he joined one of these gilds, and commenced
his journey over France, which was called the tour de France,
in the course of which he visited the principal cities, towns,
and villages, stopping for a time wherever he could secure employment.
In almost every town there was a house of call, presided over
always by a woman, who was affectionately called la Mére,
or the Mother, and the same name was given to the house itself.
There the Compagnons held their meetings and annually elected
their officers, and traveling workmen repaired there to obtain
food and lodging, and the necessary information which might lead
to employment. When two Companions met on the road, one of them
addressed the other with the topage, or challenge, being a formula
of words, the conventional reply to which would indicate that
the other was a member of the same devoir. If such was the case,
friendly greetings ensued. But if the reply was not satisfactory,
and it appeared that they belonged to different associations,
a war of words, and even of blows, was the result. Such was formerly
the custom, but through the evangelic labors of Agricol Perdiquier,
a journeyman joiner of Avignon, who traveled through France inculcating
lessons of brotherly love, a better spirit later on existed.
In each locality the association has a chief,
who is annually elected by ballot at the General Assembly of the
Craft. He is called the First Compagnon of Dignity.
He presides over the meetings, which ordinarily
take place on the first Sunday of every month, and represents
the society in its intercourse with other Bodies, -with the Masters,
or with the municipal authorities.
Compagnonage has been exposed, at various
periods, to the persecutions of the Church and the State, as well
as to the opposition of the Corporations of Masters, to which,
of course, its designs were antagonistic, because it opposed their
monopoly. Unlike them, and particularly the Corporation of Freemasons,
it was not under the protection of the Church. The practice of
its mystical receptions was condemned by the Faculty of Theology
at Paris, in 1655 A.D., as impious. But a hundred years before,
in 1541, a decree of Francis I had interdicted the Compagnons
du Tour from binding themselves by an oath, from wearing swords
or canes, from assembling in a greater number than five outside
of their Masters' houses, or from having banquets on any occasion.
During the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries, the
parliaments were continually interposing their power against the
associations of Compagnonage, as well as against other fraternities.
The effects of these persecutions, although embarrassing, were
not absolutely disastrous. In spite of them, Compagnonage was
never entirely dissolved, although a few of the trades abandoned
their devoirs ; some of which, however---such as that of the shoemakers-were
subsequently removed.
And at more recent times the gilds of the
workmen existed in France having lost, it is true, much of their
original code of religious dogmas and symbols, and, although not
recognized by the law, always tolerated by the municipal authorities
and undisturbed by the police.
To the Masonic scholar, the history of these
devoirs or gilds is peculiarly interesting. In nearly all of them
the Temple of Solomon prevails as a predominant symbol, while
the square and compass, their favorite and constant device, would
seem, in some way, to identify them with Freemasonry so far as
respects the probability of a common origin.
COMPAGNONS DU TOUR
This title was assumed by the workmen in
France who belong to the several gilds of Compagnonage, which
see. The French expression, Compagnons du Tour, or Companions
of the Tour, may be understood in two different ways according
to the meaning applied to the last word. Tour is used in French
as it is also freely employed in English to indicate a round trip,
a rambling and returning excursion of some extent. The word might
well fit those who traveled around for employment or for instruction
as did the Brethren of old. Tour is also the French for tower
and towers or castles were represented on .the coat of arms of
the Masons Company of London. In both of these meanings the allusion
has a significance easily understood.
COMPANION
A title bestowed by Royal Arch Masons upon
each other, and equivalent to the word "Brother" in
Symbolic Lodges. It refers, most probably, to the companionship
in exile and captivity of the ancient Jews, from the destruction
of the Temple by Nebuchadnezzar to its restoration by Zerubbabel,
under the auspices of Cyrus. In using this title in a higher Degree,
the Freemasons who adopted it seem to have intimated that there
was a shade of difference between its meaning and that of Brother.
The latter refers to the universal fatherhood of God and the universal
brotherhood of man; but the former represents a companionship
or common pursuit of one object-the common endurance of suffering
or the common enjoyment of happiness. Companion represents a closer
tie than Brother. The one is a natural relation shared by all
men ; the other a connection, the result of choice and confined
to a few. All men are our Brethren, not all our companions.
COMPANIONS OF PENELOPE
Also known as the Palladium of Ladies. Said
to have been established in 1740 by "seven wise men"
at Paris. Both men and women were admitted to membership and the
candidate when being initiated was conducted by two members of
the Order into the center of the Temple where was a table on which
was a white cloth with three candles placed around a statue of
Minerva, where the Oath of Secrecy, was administered.
COMPANIONS, THE TWELVE
George F. Fort says that "the twelve
Companions of Master Hiram correspond unquestionably to the twelve
zodiacal signs, or the twelve months of the year.
The groundwork of this tradition is a fragment
of ancient natural religion, common to both Oriental and European
nations; or, more properly, was derived from identical sources.
The treacherous Craftsmen of Hiram the Good are the three winter
months which slew him.
He is the sun surviving during the eleven consecutive months,
but subjected to the irresistible power of three ruffians, the
winter months ; in the twelfth and last month, that luminary,
Hiram, the good, the beauteous, the bright, the sun god, is extinguished"
(The Early History and Antiquities of Freemasonry, page 408).
COMPASSES
As in Operative Freemasonry, the compasses
are used for the measurement of the architect's plans, and to
enable him to give those just proportions which will ensure beauty
as well as stability to his work; so, in Speculative Freemasonry,
is this important implement symbolic of that even tenor of deportment,
that true standard of rectitude which alone can bestow happiness
here and felicity hereafter.
Hence are the compasses the most prominent
emblem of virtue, the true and only, measure of a Freemason's
life and conduct. As the Bible gives us light on our duties to
God, and the square illustrates our duties to our neighborhood
and Brother, so the compasses give that additional light which
is to instruct us in the duty we owe to ourselves-the great, imperative
duty of circumscribing our passions, and keeping our desires within
due bounds. "It is ordained," says the philosophic Burke,
"in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate
passions cannot be free; their passions forge their fetters."
Those Brethren who delight to trace our emblems to an astronomical
origin, find in the compasses a symbol of the sun, the circular
pivot representing the body of the luminary, and the diverging
legs his rays.
In the earliest rituals of the eighteenth
century, the compasses are described as a part of the furniture
of the Lodge, and are said to belong to the Master.
Some change will be found in this respect
in the ritual of the present day (see Square and Compasses).
The word is sometimes spelled and pronounced compass, which is
more usually applied to the magnetic needle and circular dial
or card of the mariner from which he directs his course over the
seas, or the similar guide of the airman when seeking his destination
across unknown territory.
COMPOSITE
One of the five orders of architecture introduced
by the Romans, and compounded of the other four, whence it derives
its name. Although it combines strength with beauty, yet, as it
is a comparatively modern invention, it is held in little esteem
among Freemasons.
CONCEALMENT OF THE BODY
See Aphanism.
CONCLAVE
Commanderies of Knights Templar in England and Canada were called Conclaves, and the Grand Encampment, the Grand Conclave' but the terms now in use are Preceptory and Great Priory respectively. The word is also applied to the meetings in some other of the advanced Degrees. The word is derived from the Latin con, meaning ulith, and clavis, a key, to denote the idea of being locked up in seclusion, and in this sense was first applied to the apartment in which the cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church are literally locked up when they are assembled to elect a Pope.
CONCORDISTS
A secret order established in Prussia, by M. Lang, on the wreck of the Tugendverein (Tugendverein, German for the Union of the Virtuous), which latter Body was instituted in 1790 as a successor of the Illuminati, and suppressed in 1812 by the Prussian Government, on account of its supposed political tendencies.
CONFEDERACIES
A title given to the yearly meetings of the Freemasons in the time of Henry VI, of England, and usedit in the celebrated statute passed in the third year of his reign, which begins thus: "Whereas, by the yearly congregations and confederacies made by the Masons in their General Chapiters assembled, etc." (see Laborers, Statutes of).
CONFERENCE LODGES
Assemblies of the members of a Lodge sometimes held in Germany. Their object is the discussion of the financial and other private matters of the Lodge. Lodges of this kind held in France are said to be en famille, meaning in the family. There is no such arrangement in English or American Freemasonry.
CONFERRING DEGREES
When a candidate is initiated into any Degree of Freemasonry in due form, the Degree is said to have been conferred, in contradistinction to the looser mode of imparting its secrets by communication.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
This is usually understood as being to ensure the accuracy of the statements made, the reading of the Minutes enabling the Brethren to know that the proceedings have been recorded and the judgment of those present being expressed in some way as to the correctness of the statements but the proceedings may serve a further purpose and that is to express approval of what has been previously done. In fact, Rule 130 of the English Book of Constitutions provides that the Minutes regarding the election oi a Worshipful Master must be confirmed before he can be installed.
In English Lodges any action regarding a money grant, alteration of by-laws or the election of a Master must be confirmed after the recording of the Minutes at the first subsequent regular meeting in order to become legally operative, All other points are merely confirmed for accuracy and are considered legal regardless.
CONFRATERNITY OF SAINT PAUL
The Italian name is La Confraternita di San Paolo. See Paul, Confraternity of Saint Paul.
CONFUSION OF TONGUES
The Tower of Babel is referred to in the ritual of the Third Degree as the place where language was confounded and Masonry lost. Hence, in Masonic symbolism, as Freemasonry professes to possess a universal language, the confusion of tongues at Babel is a symbol of that intellectual darkness from which the aspirant is seeking to emerge on his passage to that intellectual light which is imparted by the Order (see Threshing Floor)
CONGREGATIONS
In the Old Records and Constitutions of Freemasonry the yearly meetings of the Craft are so called. Thus, in the Halliwell or Regius Manuscript it is said, "Every Master that is a Mason must be at the General Congregation" (see line 107). What are now called Communications of a Grand Lodge were then called Congregations of the Craft. (see Assembly).
CONGRESSES, MASONIC
At various times in the history of Freemasonry conferences have been held in which, as in the General Councils of the Church, the interests of the Institution have been made the subject of consideration. These conferences have received the name of Masonic Congresses. Whenever a respectable number of Freemasons invested with deliberative powers, assemble as the representatives of different countries and Jurisdictions to take into consideration matters relating to the Order, such a meeting will be properly called a Congress. Of these Congresses some have been productive of little or no effect, while others have undoubtedly left their mark; nor can it be doubted, that if a General or Ecumenical Congress, consisting of representatives of all the Masonic powers of the world, were to meet, with an eye single to the great object of Masonic reform, and were to be guided by a liberal and conciliatory spirit of compromise, such a Congress might be of incalculable advantage.
The most important Congresses that have met since the year 926 A.D. are those of York, Strassburg, Ratisbon, Spire, Cologne, Basle, Jena, Altenberg, Brunswick, Lyons, Wolfenbuttel. Wilhelmsbad, Paris, Washington, Baltimore, Lexington, and Chicago (see them as listed under their respective titles).
CONGRESSES OF FREEMASONS
See Conventions.
CONNECTICUT
On August 12,1750, the Saint John's Grand Lodge of Massachusetts granted a Charter to Hiram Lodge, at New Haven, and David Wooster was installed as Master. A Convention held on March 13, 1783, discussed the formation of a Grand Lodge of Connecticut. Nothing definite was completed and another Convention, held on April 29, 1783, again had no result. A third Convention, however, on May 14, 1789, composed of representatives of twelve Lodges, made some progress in the necessary
arrangements but adjourned the meeting until July 8, 1789, when a Constitution was adopted and the Grand Lodge of Connecticut duly opened. The Anti-Masonic Movement had a serious effect upon the Craft in Connecticut. Up to the year 1800 Freemasonry had flourished exceedingly in the district. During the next thirty years, however, it was calumniated to such an extent that, at the annual session of 1831, all the officers of the Grand Lodge, except the Grand Treasurer, resigned and new officers were elected in their places. At the next annual session only the Grand Master and the Grand Treasurer were present. For several years Freemasonry lay under a cloud, but at last, towards 1840, the agitation began to subside and after another five years the Craft in this State was once more possessed of its early vigor.
The first Chapter in the district seems to have comprised six members of Saint John's Lodge, No. 2, of Middletown. These six Brethren opened the first regular Grand Chapter of Connecticut on September 12, 1783.
In 1818, Jeremy L. Cross, a prominent authority on Masonic Ritual in his day and author of The True Masonic Chart or Hieroglyphic Monitor and of The Templars' Chart, formed a Council of Royal and Select Masters. On May 18, 1819, ten of the eleven Councils which had been formed in 1818 and 1819 met at Hartford for the purpose of establishing a Grand Council. Two days later a Constitution was adopted, the Grand Officers elected and the Council duly constituted.
The first Encampment of Knights Templar was formed at Colchester in July, 1796, and was granted a Charter from London on September 5, 1803. New Haven Encampment took the initiative in adopting a resolution to join with other Encampments in forming a Commandery in the State. Washington and Clinton sent representatives and the meeting was held at the Masonic Hall on September 13, 1827. A Grand Encampment of Knights Templar of the State of Connecticut was formed and Sir John Watrous was installed Grand Master.
The year 1858 saw the establishment of four Bodies of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite in Connecticut. Three were chartered on June 1: namely, Lafayette Consistory, Peciounnock Chapter of Rose Croix, Washington Council of Princes of Jerusalem. The fourth, the De Witt Clinton Lodge of Perfection, was granted a Charter on May 11.
CONSECRATION
The appropriating or dedicating, with certain ceremonies, anything to sacred purposes or offices by separating it from common use. Hobbes, in his Leviathan (part iv, chapter 44), gives the best definition of this ceremony. "To consecrate is, in Scripture, to offer, give, or dedicate, in pious and decent language and gesture, a man, or any other thing, to God, by separating it from common use." Masonic Lodges, like ancient temples and modern churches, have always been consecrated. The rite of consecration, is performed by the Grand Master, when the Lodge is said to be consecrated in ample form; by the Deputy Grand Master, when it is said to be consecrated in due form; or by the proxy of the Grand Master, when it is said to be consecrated in form. The Grand Master, accompanied by his officers, proceeds to the hall of the new Lodge, where, after the performance of those ceremonies which are described in all manuals and monitors, he solemnly consecrates the Lodge with the elements of corn, wine, and oil, after which the Lodge is dedicated and constituted and the officers installed.
CONSECRATION, ELEMENTS OF
Those things, the use of which in the ceremony as constituent and elementary parts of it, are necessary to the per. fecting and legalizing of the act of consecration. In Freemasonry, these elements are corn, wine, and oil, which see in this work listed under their respective names.
CONSERVATORS, GRAND
See Grand Conservators.
CONSERVATOR MOVEMENT THE
In 1860 M. W. Robert Morris
established a secret society of Masons styled by him as The Conservator
Movement, and its members were called Conservators. The purposes
of this organization were stated by Morris with his characteristic
prolixity in a secret circular which he mailed to Grand Masters,
Grand Secretaries, Grand Lecturers, and other Grand Lodge leaders
in the middle of 1860, and which he signed as "Chief Conservator."
He set down ten objects:
To disseminate the Webb-Preston Work.
To "discountenance" innovations in the Ritual.
To establish national uniformity of "means of recognition,"
etc.
To establish "a School of Instruction in every Lodge.''
To train Masonic [Ritualistic] Lecturers.
To train Masons to pass examinations when visiting.
To strengthen "the ties that bind Masons generally together."
To detect and expose impostors. To hold conferences among Conservators
themselves.
To "open the way for a more intimate communion between the
Masons of Europe and America."
The recipient was asked to keep the circular ''strictly confidential"
;
To fill in answers to form questions ;
To sign on a dotted line; and to return the document to Morris
in ten days.
If a recipient expressed a desire to become a Conservator
he received next "Communication No. 2," also "strictly
confidential." It set forth "The Seven Details or Features
of the Plan" which were expected to govern the work of each
Conservator:
1. The scheme was to be a closely-guarded
secret among the few men in each Lodge who were active Conservators.
2. Each Conservator was to keep in close
touch with the Chief Conservator, and carry out the latter's order.
"A journal, styled The Conservator" was to be sent to
each member of the organization.
3. The "great aim" was "National
Harmony in the Work and Lectures on Symbolical Masonry."
All forms of "Bastard" Work were to be opposed.
4. The "Conservator's Degree'' was
to be conferred on each Conservator, "devised for the express
purpose.
5. A Vice Chief Conservator was to be present
at each Grand Communication of each and every Grand Lodge.
6. "We adopt the mode of disseminating
the Work and Lectures which was adopted by the Grand Lodge of
England in 1728."
7. "We require a contribution of Ten
Dollars in advance from each Conservator.
During the years between
1860 and 1863 Morris issued his journal styled The Conservator
some four or five times ; afterwards he addressed his followers
through the pages of his magazine, The Voice of Masonry. The "society"
was so loosely administered that Morris himself did not know how
many were in it, but "guessed" that it may at one time
have had 2,795 members. It transpired that the "mode of disseminating"
as mentioned under "detail" number 6 was a printed cipher,
a tiny book entitled Written Mnemonics Illustrated By Copious
Examples From Moral Philosophy, Science, And Religion. The association
was governed by Morris himself according to "eight regulations."
The "era" of the association was to begin June 24, 1860,
and last until June 24, 1865, at which latter date it would everywhere
automatically cease to exist ; this period of 1826 days was described
as the Conservator's Era, or C. E., and letters were to be dated
according to it. A secret language, cabalistic signs, etc., were
much used. Morris officially declared the termination of the "Society"
in the first issue of The Voice of Masonry after June 24, 1860.
For the members of his association Morris prepared the "Conservator
of Symbolic Masonry" Degree. There could be only one Conservator
in each Lodge, but he could confer this Degree on any Master Mason
deemed suitable by himself.
The Conservator Movement has thus a secret
society. It had national and local officers; its own constitution
and rules; its own modes of recognition and a secret language;
and though it has to work in a Lodge and on a Lodge; a Lodge had
no say about it, and no control over it. It had in effect two
general purposes: first, to establish a standard work uniform
throughout the Grand Jurisdictions; second, to make the Webb-Preston
Work that Standard version. Once they had discovered its existence
and had become aware of its nature and purpose Grand Lodges began
a determined campaign to abolish the Movement.
It was intolerable to have a secret society
at work within the Fraternity itself; it was for a Grand Lodge,
not for a voluntary society of outsiders, to determine what its
own Standard Work was to be; a Lodge could not permit one of its
own members to have more authority than its own Master; nor was
Morris himself able to prove that he, and he alone, possessed
the Webb-Preston Work in its original form.
In 1866 Morris stated, as already noted,
that at its height his association numbered 2,795 members, but
it is probable that at least a thousand of these were inactive,
or else were prevented by Lodge and Grand Lodge opposition from
accomplishing their purposes; moreover Civil War conditions hampered
them. The whole movement was quickly aborted and soon passed out
of the memory of the American Craft.
NOTE. The most complete set of Conservator
literature and correspondence, including a number of private letters
from Morris, is in the vaults of the Iowa Grand Lodge Library,
Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The most complete published account is The
Masonic Conservators, by Ray V. Denslow; Grand Lodge of Missouri;
St. Louis; 1931; cloth ; 132 pages. It contains a list of members
Lodge by Lodge, and State by State.
CONSISTORY
The meetings of members of the Thirty-second Degree, or Sublime Princes of the Royal Secret in the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, are called Consistories. The elective officers are, according to the ritual of the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States, a Commander-in-Chief, Seneschal, Preceptor, Chancellor, Minister of State, Almoner, Registrar, and Treasurer. In the Northern Jurisdiction it is slightly different, the second and third officers being called Lieutenant-Commanders. A Consistory confers the Thirty-first and Thirty-second Degrees of the Rite in the Southern Jurisdiction; in the Northern Jurisdiction the Consistory confers the Degrees from the nineteenth to the thirty-second inclusive.
CONSISTORY, GRAND
See Grand Consistory
CONSOLIDATION OF LODGES
If in the same Masonic community two sister
Lodges find that they are duplicating each other, or if one finds
itself too weak to continue, either of two courses is followed
in American practice. The weaker of the two Lodges can surrender
its Charter, and its members can affiliate with the other Lodge.
Or, the two Lodges can consolidate. A comparison of the forty-nine
Codes of American Grand Jurisdictions shows that the Code of Iowa
comes close to being perfectly typical of the rules governing
consolidation as generally they are in use. The Iowa Code calls
for a written ballot; for a majority decision; if the smaller
of the two Lodges cannot assemble a quota the Grand Master and
other members of Grand Lodge accompanying him can constitute one.
(See Sections 188 and 190 of revised Masonic Code of Iowa.)
CONSTABLE, GRAND
The fourth officer in a Grand Consistory. It is the title which was formerly given to the leader of the land forces of the Knights Templar.
CONSTANTINE
See Red Cross of Rome and Constantine.
CONSTANTINE, THE CROSS OF
The paragraph entitled Labarum on page 557
was based on Eusebius, the earliest of the chroniclers of the
Christian Church, and the biographer of the Emperor Constantine.
Since that paragraph was written a very large quantity of Greek
(Koine) MSS. dating from the First to the Fifth Centuries have
been recovered by archeologists, notably in the Fayum, once a
prosperous Greek-speaking district in an irrigated tract on the
Egyptian border. Since these were records written at the time
their weight as evidence cannot be ignored.
These documents sustain Eusebius in general
outline, but make the story of Constantine's use of the monogram
much more complex. He did not originate it.
The legend of his vision rests on very insecure
grounds, partly because though the Athanasians won control at
the Council of Nicea, which Constantine had called, and had condemned
the Arians as non-Christians, Constantine himself remained an
Arian throughout his life until shortly before his death.
The original labarum was not so much a banner
as a portrait on cloth, showing Constantines head surrounded by
a halo, which was probably designed to be carried as a substitute
for his own presence. The halo and the monogram together may have
denoted that he was head of the whole Christian world. An old
legend has it that his mother, Queen Helen, was an English woman,
and that she had discovered the true cross. Long after the death
of Constantine the Bishop of Rome produced a document in which
the Emperor had willed his headship of the Christian world to
Rome; the authenticity of this "Donation of Constantine"
was upheld by Rome for centuries. It is proved to have been a
forgery, written two hundred years after Constantine; Roman Catholic
scholars themselves are agreed on this. For a succinct account
see last edition of Encyclopedia Britannia. For full details see
Medieval Italy, a brilliant work, by H. B. Cotterill; London;
Geo. C. Harrap; 1915.
CONSTANTINOPLE, KNIGHT OF
In the year 1864 Brother F. G. Irwin, a
distinguished Freemason, lived at Devonport, England. He became
a welcome visitor to, and subsequently a member of the then recently
established Lodge, Saint Aubyn, No. 954. Among other Masonic acquirements
he had authority to establish the Order of the Knights of Constantinople.
It was found that other authority to establish this Order did
not exist in England, although it had been conferred on a few
individual by Brother Irwin, and according to the usages of the
Fraternity, those who first established an Order became the ruling
power. The ground being thus clear, the authority of Brother Irwin,
Past Junior Warden of the Province of Andalusia, Past Grand Master
Overseer of Mark Masonry in England, First Grand standard Bearer
of Knights Templar in England, and past Most Wise Sovereign Rose
Croix, &c., was brought into operation. He accordingly presided
over a meeting of Freemasons in the Saint Aubyn Lodge, No. 954,
at Morice Town, Devonport, on January 18, 1865, and after intrusting
them with the secrets of the Order and elevating to the honor
of Knighthood, appointed the following Brethren as Officers of
the First or Saint Aubyn Council of Knights of Constantinople,
namely : Samuel Chapple, Horace Byron Kent, John R. H. Spry, Vincent
Bird, Philip B. Clemens.
At this meeting several prominent Freemasons
were admitted, Brother Shuttleworth, Thirty-third Degree, the
Grand Vice-Chancellor of the Knights Templar of England, being
among the number. At the February meeting several active Freemasons
were admitted, amongst them Brother W. J. Hughan, initiated in
Lodge No. 954, and who later attained world-wide Masonic fame.
At the January meeting, 1866, a Warrant was granted to certain
distinguished Freemasons in Cornwall to open a Council at Truro,
the Fortitude, Brother W. J. Hughan to be first Illustrious Sovereign,
and a number of Cornish Freemasons were enlisted. The Saint Aubyn
Council of the Knights of Constantinople developed into a Grand
Council of Sovereigns of the Order and exercised such functions
as organizing subordinate bodies. It became afflicted and a part
of the organization at Mark Masons Hall, England, the Grand Council
of the Allied Degrees. The Order of Knights of Constantinople
is of a Christian character, associated in legend with the Emperor
Constantine, and teaches the lesson of universal equality The
jewel of the organization is a Cross surmounted by a Crescent.
CONSTITUTED, LEGALLY
The phrase, a legally constituted Lodge,
is often used Masonically to designate any Lodge working under
proper authority, which necessarily includes Lodges working under
Dispensation, although, strictly, a Lodge cannot be legally constituted
until it has received its warrant or Charter from the Grand Lodge.
But so far as respects the regularity of their work, Lodges under
Dispensation and Warranted Lodges have the same standing.
CONSTITUTION OF A LODGE
Any number of Master Masons, not less than
seven, being desirous of forming a new Lodge, having previously
obtained a Dispensation from the Grand Master, must apply by petition
to the Grand Lodge of the State in which they reside, praying
for a Charter, or Warrant of Constitution, to enable them to assemble
as a regular Lodge. Their petition being favorably received, a
Warrant or Charter for the Lodge is immediately granted, and the
Grand Master appoints a day for its consecration and for the installation
of its officers.
The Lodge having been consecrated, the Grand
Master, or person acting as such, declares the Brethren "to
be constituted and formed into a regular Lodge of Free and Accepted
Masons," after which the officers of the Lodge are installed.
In this declaration of the Master, accompanied with the appropriate
ceremonies, consists the constitution of the Lodge. Until a Lodge
is thus legally constituted, it forms no component of the constituency
of the Grand Lodge, can neither elect officers nor members, and
exists only as a Lodge under dispensation at the will of the Grand
Master.
CONSTITUTION, PARIS
See Paris Constitutions
CONSTITUTIONS, BOOK OF
See Book of Constitutions
CONSTITUTIONS OF 1762
This is the name of one of that series of
Constitutions, or Regulations, which have always been deemed of
importance in the history of the Ancient and accepted Scottish
Rite; although the Constitutions of 1762 have really nothing to
do with that Rite, having been adopted long before its establishment.
In the year 1758, there was founded at Paris a Masonic Body which
assumed the title of the Chapter or Council, of Emperors of the
East and West, and which organized a Rite known as the Rite of
Perfection, consisting of twenty-five Degrees, and in the same
year the Rite was carried to Berlin by the Marquis de Bernez.
In the following year, a Council of Princes
of the Royal Secret, the highest Degree conferred in the Rite,
was established at Bordeaux. On September 21, 1762, nine Commissioners
met and drew up Constitutions for the government of the Rite of
Perfection, which have been since known as the Constitutions of
1762. Of the place where the Commissioners met, there is some
doubt. Of the two copies, hereafter to be noticed, which are in
the archives of the Southern Supreme Council, that of Delahogue
refers to the Orients of Paris and Berlin, while that of Aveilhé
says that they were made at the Grand Orient of Bordeaux.
Thory also (Acta Latomorum, 1, 79), names
Bordeaux as the place of their enactment, and so does Ragon (Orthodoxie
Maçonnique, 133); although he doubts their authenticity,
and says that there is no trace of any such document at Bordeaux,
nor any recollection there of the Consistory which is said to
have drawn up the Constitutions.
To this it may be answered, that in the
Archives of the Mother Supreme Council at Charleston there are
two manuscript copies of these Constitutions--one written by Jean
Baptiste Marie Delahogue in 1798, which is authenticated by Count
de Grasse, under the seal of the Grand Council of the Princes
of the Royal secret, then sitting at Charleston; and another,
written by Jean Baptiste Aveilhé in 1797.
This copy is authenticated by Long, Delahogue,
De Grasse, and others. Both documents are written in French, and
are almost substantially the same. The translated tittle of Delahogue's
copy is as follows :
Constitutions and Regulations drawn up by
nine Commissioners appointed by the Grand Council of the Sovereign-
Princes of the Royal Secret at the Grand Orients of Paris and
Berlin, by virtue of the deliberation of the fifth day of the
third week of the seventh Month of the Hebrew Era, 1662, and of
the Christian Era, 1762. To be ratified and observed by the Grand
Councils of the sublime Knights and Princes of Masonry as well
as by the particular Councils and Grand Inspectors regularly constituted
in the two Hemispheres.
The title of Aveilhé's manuscript
differs in this, that it says the Constitutions were enacted "at
the Grand Orient of Bordeaux, " and that they were "transmitted
to our Brother Stephen Morin, Grand Inspector of all the Lodges
in the New World." Probably this is a correct record, and
the Constitutions were prepared at Bordeaux. The Constitutions
of 1762 consist of thirty-five articles, and are principally occupied
in providing for the government of the Rite established by the
Council of Emperors of the East and West and of the Bodies under
it.
The Constitutions of 1762 were published
at Paris, in 1832, in the Recueil des Actes du Conscil Suprême
de France or Collected Proceedings of the Supreme Council of France.
They were also published, in 1859, in America; but the best printed
exemplar of them is that published in French and English in the
Book of Grand Constitutions, edited by Brother Albert Pike, which
is illustrated with copious and valuable annotations by the editor,
who was the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Southern Supreme
Council.
CONSTITUTIONS OF 1786
These have been generally regarded by the
members of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite as the fundamental
law of their Rite. They are said to have been established by Frederick
II, of Prussia, in the last year of his life ; a statement, however,
that has been denied by some writers (see Mackey's revised History
of Freemasonry under Early History of the Scottish Rite; Findel's
History of Freemasonry under Declaration of the Grand Lodge of
the Three Globes at Berlin; also Gould's History of Freemasonry
under The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite). The controversies
as to their authenticity have made them a subject of interest
to all Masonic scholars. Brother Albert Pike, the Grand Commander
of the Supreme Council for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United
States, published them, in 1872, in Latin, French, and English;
and his exhaustive annotations are valuable because he has devoted
to the investigation of their origin and their authenticity more
elaborate care than any other writer.
Of these Constitutions,
there are two exemplars, one in French and one in Latin, between
which there are, however, some material differences. For a long
time the French exemplar only was known in this country. It is
supposed by Brother Pike that it was brought to Charleston by
Count de Grasse, and that under its provisions he organized the
Supreme Council in that place. They were accepted by the Southern
Supreme Council, and have been regard
by the Northern Supreme
Council as the only authentic Constitutions. But there is abundant
internal evidence of the incompleteness and incorrectness of the
French Constitutions, of whose authenticity there is no proof,
nor is it likely that they were made at Berlin and approved by
Frederick, as they profess.
The Latin Constitutions were probably
not known in France until after the Revolution. In 1834, they
were accepted as authentic by the Supreme Council of France, and
published there in the same year. A copy of this was published
in America, in 1859, by Brother Pike. These Latin Constitutions
of 1786 have been accepted by the Supreme Council of the Southern
jurisdiction in preference to the French version. Most of the
other Supreme Councils-those, namely, of England and Wales, of
Italy, and of South America have adopted them as the law of the
Rite, repudiating the French version as of no authority.
The definite
and well-authorized conclusions to which Brother Pike has arrived
on the subject of these Constitutions have been expressed by that
eminent Freemason in the following language :
"We think we
may safely say, that the charge that the Grand Constitutions were
forged at Charleston is completely disproved, and that it will
be contemptible hereafter to repeat it. No set of speculating
Jews constituted the Supreme Council established there; and those
who care for the reputations of Colonel Mitchell, and Doctors
Dalcho, Auld, and Moultrie, may well afford to despise the scurrilous
libels of the Ragons, Clavels, and Folgers. "And, secondly,
that it is not by any means proven or certain that the Constitutions
were not really made at Berlin, as they purport to have been,
and approved by Frederick. We think that 'the preponderance of
evidence, internal and external, is on the side of their authenticity,
apart from the positive evidence of the certificate of 1832. "And,
thirdly, that the Supreme Council at Charleston had a perfect
right to adopt them as the law of the new Order; no matter where,
when, or by whom they were made, as Anderson's Constitutions were
adopted in Symbolic Masonry; that they are and always have been
the law of the Rite, because they were so adopted ; and because
no man has ever lawfully received the degrees of the Rite without
swearing to maintain them as its supreme law; for as to the articles
themselves, there is no substantial difference between the French
and Latin copies. "And, fourthly, that there is not one particle
of proof of any sort, circumstantial or historical, or by argument
from improbability, that they are not genuine and authentic. In
law, documents of great age, found in the possession of those
interested under them, to whom they rightfully belong, and with
whom they might naturally be expected to be found, are admitted
in evidence without proof, to establish title or facts. They prove
themselves, and to be avoided must be disproved by evidence. There
is no evidence against the genuineness of these Grand Constitutions.''
We have alluded to the controversies aroused by the historical
concepts formed of these documents. But we must warn the readers
against assuming that this was ever understood by the leading
disputants as any argument against the legality of them. That
was quite another thing.
Both Brothers Pike and Carson, differing
widely as they did upon the source of the Constitutions in 1786,
were agreed upon the legal aspect. Brother Enoch Terry Carson,
then Deputy of the Scottish Rite for Ohio, says, "We shall
not enter into a discussion of the question as to whether these
Constitutions had the origin claimed for them or not, it is sufficient
to say that they were recognized, and that under and by authority
of them the Southern Supreme Council, at Charleston, the first
in the world, was organized and until 1813, possessed exclusive
jurisdiction over the United States; and all other regular Supreme
Councils from that day down to the present have, and still recognize
them. If they, the Constitutions of 1786, ever were irregular,
they ceased to be so to any and every Supreme Council the very
moment they recognized and adopted them. Without , them there
can be no Thirty-third Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish
Rite.''
Brother Albert Pike is equally direct to the point where
he says very plainly, "But the validity and effect of these
Constitutions did not depend on their emanating from Frederick.
On the contrary, he had no power to make any such laws. Their
force and effect as law depended on their adoption as such by
the first Body of the Rite" (see Mackey's revised History
of Freemasonry, pages 1836-7).
CONSTITUTIONS, OLD
See Records, Old
CONSUMMATUM EST
Latin, meaning it is finished. A phrase used in some of the higher
degrees of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. It is borrowed
from the expression used by our Lord when He said, on the cross,
"It is finished," meaning that the work which had been
given him to do had been executed. It is, therefore, appropriately
used in the closing ceremonies to indicate that the sublime work
of the degrees is finished, so that all may retire in peace.
CONTEMPLATIVE
To contemplate is, literally, to watch and
inspect the Temple. The augur, or prophet, among the Romans, having
taken his stand on the Capitoline Hill, marked out with his wand
the space in the heavens he intended to consult. This space he
called the templum, the Latin word for a designated or marked-off
area. Having divided his templum into two parts from top to bottom,
he watched to see what would occur. The watching of the templum
was called contemplating; and hence those who devoted themselves
to meditation upon sacred subjects assumed this title. Thus, among
the Jews, the Essenes and the Therapeutists, and, among the Greeks,
the school of Pythagoras, were contemplative sects. Among the
Freemasons, the word speculative is used as equivalent to contemplative
(see Speculative Freemasonry).
CONTINENTAL LODGES
This expression is used throughout this
work, as it constantly is by English writers, to designate the
Lodges on the Continent of Europe which retain many usages which
have either been abandoned by, or never were observed in, the
Lodges of England, Ireland, and Scotland, as well as the United
States of America. The words Continental Freemasonry are employed
in the same sense.
CONTUMACY
In civil law, contumacy, or stubbornness,
is the refusal or neglect of a party accused to appear and answer
to a charge preferred against him in a court of justice. In Masonic
jurisprudence, it is disobedience of or rebellion against superior
authority, as when a Freemason refuses to obey the edict of his
Lodge, or a Lodge refuses to obey that of the Grand Master or
the Grand Lodge. The punishment, in the former case, is generally
suspension or expulsion ; in the latter, arrest of Charter or
forfeiture of Warrant.
CONVENTION
In a state or territory where there is no Grand Lodge, but three
or more Lodges holding their Warrants of Constitution from Grand
Lodges outside of the territory, these Lodges may meet together
by their representatives - who should Properly be the first three
officers of each Lodge - and take the necessary steps for the organization
of a Lodge in that state or territory. This preparatory meeting
is called a Contention. A President and Secretary are chosen,
and a Grand Lodge is formed by the election of a Grand Master
and other proper officers, when the old Warrants are returned
to the Grand Lodges, and new ones taken out from the newly formed
Grand Lodge. Not less than three Lodges are required to constitute
a Convention. The first Convention of this kind ever held was
that of the four old Lodges of London, which met at the Apple-Tree
Tavern, in 1716, and in the following year formed the Grand Lodge
of England.
CONVENTION NIGHT
A title sometimes given in the Minutes of
English Lodges to a Lodge of Emergency. Thus, in the minutes of
Constitution Lodge, No. 390 (London), we read: "This being
a Convection Night to consider the state of the Lodge," etc.
(see Sadler's History and Records of the Lodge of Emulation, page
64).
CONVENTIONS or CONGRESSES
of Freemasons, arranged in chronological
order:
926. York, under Prince Edwin of England.
1275. Strassburg,under Edwin Von Steinbach
1459. Ratisbon, under Jost Dolzinger.
1464. Ratisbon, under Grand Lodge of Strassburg.
1469. Spire,under Grand Lodge of Strassburg.
1535. Cologne, by Hermann, Bishop of Cologne.
1563. Basle, by Grand Lodge of Strassburg.
1717. London, by the Four Old Lodges. Organization of Grand Lodge.
1730. Dublin, by the Dublin Lodges.
1736. Edinburgh. Organization and institution of Grand Lodge.
1756. Hague, by the Royal Union Lodge.
1762. Paris and Berlin, by nine commissioners nominated by the Sovereign Grand Council of Princes of Freemasonry.
1763. Jena, by the Lodge of Strict Observance.
1764. Jena, by Johnson or Beeker, denounced by Baron Hund.
1765. Altenberg, a continuation wherein Hund was elected Grand Master of the Rite of Strict Observance.
1772. Kohl, by Ferdinand of Brunswick and Baron Hund, without success.
1775. Brunswick, by Ferdinand, Duke of Brunswick.
1778. Lyons, by Lodge of Chevaliers Bienfaisants.
1778. Wolfenbuttel, by Duke of Brunswick.
1782. Wilhelmsbad, and impotent session for purification.
1784. Paris, a medley of Lovers of Truth and United Friends.
1786. Berlin, alleged to have been convened by Frederick II of Prussia.
1822. National Masonic Congress, Washington, District of Columbia, March 9.
1842. National Masonic Congress, Washington, District of Columbia, March 7.
1843. National Masonic Convention, Baltimore, Maryland, May 8,
1847. National Masonic Convention, Baltimore, Maryland, September 23,
1853. National Masonic Convention, Lexington, Kentucky, September 17,
1855. Paris, by Grand Orient of France.
1855. National Masonic Convention, Washington, District of Columbia, Jan 3-4
1859. National Masonic Convention, Chicago, Illinois, September 13,
1893. Masonic Congress, Chicago, Illinois, August 14-17,
1909. Conference of Grand Masters, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 1,
1909. Conference of Grand Masters, Baltimore, Maryland, November 16,
1913. Conference of Grand Masters, Indianapolis, Indiana, March 17.
1914. Conference of Grand Masters, St. Louis, Missouri, May 14-16.
1918. Conference of Grand Masters, New York City, New York, May 9-10,
1918. Conference of Grand Masters, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, November 26-28,
1919. Masonic Service Association, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, November 11-13,
1920. Masonic Service Association, St. Louis, Missouri, November 9-10,
1921. Masonic Service Association, Chicago, Illinois, November 9-11,
1922. Masonic Service Association, Kansas City, Missouri, November 17-19,
1923. Masonic Service Association, Washington, Distr. of Col., Oct. 29-30.
1924. Masonic Service Association, Chicago, Illinois, November 11-12.
Following the meeting
at Cedar Rapids in 1919, Masonic Service Association has met at
St. Louis, Mo., November 9-10, 1920; Chicago, Ill., November 9-11,
1921; Kansas City, Mo., November 17-19, 1922; Washington, D. C.,
October 29-30, 1923; Chicago, Ill., November 11-12, 1924, and
so on annually, a Conference of Grand Masters usually being held
at the same place conveniently about that time. 1875. Lausanne.
A Convention of the Supreme Councils of the Ancient and Accepted
Scottish Rite of the World, which subsequently led to an eternal
bond of unity both offensive and defensive.
Conversation among the Brethren during Lodge hours is forbidden
by the Charges of 1722 in these words: "You are not to hold
private committees or separate conversation without leave from
the Master" (see Constitutions, 1723, page 53).
CONVOCATION
The meetings of Chapters of Royal Arch Freemasons
are so called from the Latin convocation, meaning a calling together.
It seems very properly to refer to the convoking of the dispersed
Freemasons at Jerusalem to rebuild the second Temple, of which
every Chapter is a representation.
CONVOCATION, GRAND
The meeting of a Grand Chapter is so styled.
COOKE, MATTHEW
English Masonic writer; edited an early
prose Masonic Constitutions known as the Additional Manuscript,
1861. Brother Cooke arranged a number of musical scores for the
Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction, United
States.
COOKE'S MANUSCRIPT
The old document commonly known among Masonic
scholars as Matthew Cooke's Manuscript, because it was first given
to the public by that distinguished Brother, was published by
him, in 1861, from the original in the British Museum, which institution
purchased it, on the 14th of October, 1859, from Mrs. Caroline
Baker. It was also published in facsimile by the Quatuor Coronati
Lodge, No. 2076, London, in 1890. Its principal value is derived
from the fact, as Brother Cooke remarks, that until its appearance
''there was no prose work of such undoubted antiquity known to
be in existence on the subject.''
Brother Cooke gives the following
account of the Manuscript in his preface to its republication:
By permission of the Trustees of the British Museum, the following
little work has been allowed to be copied and published in its
entire form. The original is to be found among the additional
manuscripts in that national collection, and is numbered 23,198.
Judging from the character of the handwriting and the form of
contractions employed by the scribe, it was most probably written
in the litter portion of the fifteenth century, and may be considered
a very clear specimen of the penmanship of that period. By whom
or for whom it was originally penned there is no means of ascertaining;
but from the style, it may be conjectured to have belonged to
some Master of the Craft, and to have been used in assemblies
of Freemasons as a text-book of the traditional history and laws
of the Fraternity.
COPELAND, PATRICK
A native of Udaught, Scotland. In 1590,
by Royal Patent, because his ancestors had held the same office,
he was made Patron for life of the Freemasons of Aberdeen, Banff
and Kincardine.
COPE-STONE
See Capstone
CORD, HINDU SACRED
See Zennaar
CORD, SILVER
See Silver Cord
CORD, THREEFOLD
See Threefold Cord
CORDON
The Masonic decoration, which in English
is called the collar, is styled by the French Freemasons the cordon.
CORINTHIAN ORDER
This is the lightest and most ornamental
of the pure orders, and possesses the highest degree of richness
and detail that architecture attained under the Greeks. Its capital
is its great distinction, and is richly adorned with leaves of
acanthus, olive, etc., and other ornaments. The column of Beauty
which supports the Lodge is of the Corinthian Order, and its appropriate
situation and symbolic officer are in the South.
CORK, ORDER OF THE
A side Degree found in British Masonic circles
and practiced with that excellent conviviality characteristic
of the Brethren. The main object is to provide an opportunity
for the display of high spirits on some especial occasion. Significant
of the membership is a jewel, a section or slice of cork, usually
enclosed in a metal band for attachment to the watch-chain as
a charm or pendant, or carried as a pocket-piece. The absence
of this emblem or pledge when a member is challenged by another
one subjects the corkless Brother to a forfeit, which again is
commonly and appropriately the cause of mutual enjoyment.
CORNER, NORTHEAST
See Northeast Corner
CORNER-STONE, SYMBOLISM OF THE
The corner-stone is the stone which lies
at the corner of two walls and forms the corner of the foundation
of an edifice. In Masonic buildings it is now always placed in
the Northeast; but this rule was not always formerly observed.
As the foundation on which the entire structure is supposed to
rest, it is considered by Operative Freemasons as the most important
stone in the edifice. It is laid with impressive ceremonies; the
assistance of Speculative Freemasons is often, and ought always
to be, invited to give dignity to the occasion; and for this purpose
Freemasonry has provided an especial ritual which is to govern
the proper performance of that duty.
Among the ancients the corner-stone of important
edifices was laid with impressive ceremonies. These are well described
by Tacitus in the history of the rebuilding of the Capital. After
detailing the preliminary ceremonies, which consisted of a procession
of vestals, who with chaplets of flowers encompassed the ground
and consecrated it by libations of living water, he adds that,
after solemn prayer, Helvidius Priscus, to whom the care of rebuilding
the Capitol had been committed, "laid his hand upon the fillets
that adorned the foundation stone, and also the cords by which
it was to be drawn to its place. In that instant the magistrates,
the priests, the senators, the Roman knights, and a number of
citizens, all acting with one effort and general demonstrations
of joy, laid hold of the ropes and dragged the ponderous load
to its destined spot. They then threw in ingots of gold and silver,
and other metals which had never been melted in the furnace, but
still retained, untouched by human art, their first formation
in the bowels of the earth" (see Histories iv, 53).
The symbolism of the corner-stone when duly
laid with Masonic rites is full of significance, which refers
to its form, to its situation, to its permanence, and to its consecration.
As to its form, it must be perfectly square
on its surfaces, and in its solid contents a cube. Now the square
is a symbol of morality, and the cube, of truth.
In its situation it lies between the north,
the place of darkness, and the east, the place of light; and hence
this position symbolizes the Masonic progress from darkness to
light, and from ignorance to knowledge.
The permanence and durability of the corner-stone,
which lasts long after the building in whose foundation it was
placed has fallen into decay, is intended to remind the Freemason
that, when this earthly house of his tabernacle shall have passed
away, he has within him a sure foundation of eternal life-a corner-stone
of immortality-an emanation from that Divine Spirit which pervades
all nature, and which, therefore, must survive the tomb, and rise,
triumphant and eternal, above the decaying dust of death and the
grave.
The stone, when deposited in its appropriate
place, is carefully examined with the necessary implements of
Operative Freemasonry-the square, the level, and the plumb, themselves
all symbolic in meaning-and is then declared to be "well
formed, true, and trusty.'' Thus the Freemason is taught that
his virtues are to be tested by temptation and trial, by suffering
and adversity, before they can be pronounced by the Master Builder
of souls to be materials worthy of the spiritual building of eternal
life, fitted, "as living stones, for that house not made
with hands, eternal in the heavens." And lastly, in the ceremony
of depositing the cornerstone, the elements of Masonic consecration
are produced, and the stcne is solemnly set apart by pouring corn,
wine, and oil upon its surface, emblematic of the Nourishment,
Refreshment, and Joy which are to be the rewards of a faithful
performance of duty.
The comer-stone does not appear to have
been adopted by any of the heathen nations, but tc have been as
the eben pinah, peculiar to the Jews, from whom it descended to
the Christians. In the Old Testament, it seems always to have
denoted a prince or high personage, and hence the Evangelists
constantly use it in reference to Christ, who is called the Chief
Comer-stone. In Masonic symbolism, it signifies a true Freemason,
and therefore it is the first character which the Apprentice is
made to represent after his initiation has been completed.
Saint Martin-in-the-Fields Church, perhaps
the best known church in London, was the first in England to have
its foundation stone laid with special Masonic ceremony after
the coming into existence of the Grand Lodge there. This event
took place in 1724, in the reign of King George I, whose direct
descendant, the Duke of Connaught, was Grand Master two hundred
years later (see Freemason, March 7, 1925).
The first or cornerstone of the Baltimore
and Ohio Railroad was laid by the Grand Master of Maryland with
the Grand Masters of Pennsylvania and Virginia co-operating with
the Brethren of Maryland.
The stone was laid on July 4, 1824, in Carroll's
Field at Baltimore and the first spading of the ground where the
stone was to rest was dug by the venerable Charles Carroll of
Carrollton, then the only living signer of the Declaration of
Independence. Brother E. T. Schultz (Freemasonry in Maryland,
pages 562-79) says that the first train over this new railroad
reached the bank of the Ohio River, January 11, 1853. The several
city trades took part in the procession and presented gifts to
Mr. Carroll, one from the Weavers and Tailors was "a coat
made on the way."
Allusions to public ceremonies by the Craft
are frequent in the old records. One of Tuesday, August 27, 1822,
deserves mention, not because of the distance in elapsed time
from that date to the present, but by reason of the close identity
of the custom in Great Britain and in other Countries during these
many years. The occasion was the laying of the Foundation-stone
of the National Monument of Scotland, at Edinburgh, and after
describing the usual procession, and the placing of coins, newspapers,
plans, etc., in the cavities of the stone, these were covered
with inscribed plates. 'the first being headed "To the Glory
of God-In honor of the King-For the Good of the People."
Then Laurie's History of Free Masonry and the Grand Lodge of Scotland
(1849, page 201) continues:
The Most Worshipful the Grand Master proceeded
with the ceremony, and having applied the square, the plumb, and
the level respectively to the stone, with the mallet he gave three
knocks, saying,-"May the Almighty Architect of the Universe
look down with benignity upon our present undertaking, and crown
this splendid edifice with every success; and may it be considered,
for time immemorial, a model of taste and genius and serve to
transmit with honor to posterity the names of the artists engaged
in it"; followed by the Grand Honors from the Brethren, and
the Band playing "On. on my dear Brethren.
" When the music ceased, the cornucopia
with corn, and the cups with wine and oil were delivered by the
Grand Wardens to the Substitute Grand Master, who in succession
handed them to the Most Worshipful the Grand Master, when he,
according to ancient custom, poured out the corn, the wine, and
the oil upon the stone, saying, "Praise be to the Lord immortal
and eternal, Who formed the heavens, laid the foundations of the
earth, and extended the waters beyond it, Who supports the pillars
of Nations, and maintains in order and harmony surrounding Worlds:
We implore Thy aid, and may the continued blessings of an all bounteous
Providence be the lot of these our native shores.
Almighty Ruler of Events, deign to direct
the hand of our gracious Sovereign, so that he may pour down blessings
upon his people; and may they, living under sage laws and a free
government, ever feel grateful for the blessings they enjoy'':
Which was followed by the Grand Honors from the Brethren, and
prolonged cheering from the Royal Commissioners and spectators.
Brother Laurie also tells on page 207 of the curious fact that
on April 30, 1824, "the Foundation-stone of the new road
or approach to Glasgow from London was laid, by sanction of the
Grand Lodge, by the Right Honorable Lord Provost Smith of Glasgow,
Depute Provincial Grand Master of the Lower Ward of Lancanshire,
in presence of a large assemblage of the Brethren and a great
number of spectators."
An unusual method of laying the Foundation-stone
of a Masonic Temple took place in London on July 14, 1927. The
site of the Temple in Great Queen Street, Ringsway, would not
accommodate a large crowd, so it was arranged that the Grand Master
of English Freemasons, the Duke of Connaught, should perform the
ceremony at Royal Albert Hall, nearly three miles away. A replica
of the stone was laid on a specially erected platform in the great
hall where some ten thousand Freemasons from all parts of the
Empire attended in their regalia. The ceremony in Albert Hall
was performed simultaneously with the laying of the actual stone
in Great Queen Street by means of special electrical contrivances.
A distinction should be made between Comer-stone
and Foundation Stone. Doctor Mackey was emphatic on this point
and it is well to have the matter in mind. But the two are not
always distinguished definitely in the records. We have placed
several items together here which the reader can list as he personally
may choose. The precise classification of comer-stones of railroads
and foundation stones of highways, judged by any Masonic requirement,
is probably best left to individual taste. The subject may be
considered under the several heads, Foundation Stone, and Stone
of Foundation.
CORN OF NOURISHMENT
One of the three elements of Masonic consecration
(see Corn, Wine, and Oil).
CORNUCOPIA
The horn of plenty. The old Pagan myth tells
us that Zeus was nourished during his infancy in Crete by the
daughters of Melissus, with the milk of the goat Amalthea. Zeus,
when he came to the empire of the world, in gratitude placed Amalthea
in the heavens as a constellation, and gave one of her horns to
his nurses, with the assurance that it should furnish them with
a never-failing supply of whatever they might desire. Hence it
is a symbol of abundance, and as such has been adopted as the
jewel of the Stewards of a Lodge, to remind them that it is their
duty to see that the tables are properly furnished at refreshment,
and that every Brother is suitably served. Among the deities whose
images are to be found in the ancient Temples at Elora, in Hindustan,
is the goddess Ana Purna, whose name is compounded of Ana, signifying
corn, and Puma, meaning plenty.
She holds a corn measure in her hand, and
the whole therefore very clearly has the same allusion as the
Masonic Horn of plenty.
CORN, WINE, AND OIL
Corn, wine, and oil are the Masonic elements
of consecration. The adoption of these symbols is supported by
the highest antiquity. Corn, wine, and oil were the most important
productions of Eastern countries; they constituted the wealth
of the people, and were esteemed as the supports of life and the
means of refreshment David enumerates them among the greatest
blessings that we enjoy, and speaks of them as "wine that
maketh glad the heart of man, and oil to make his face to shine,
and bread which strengtheneth man's heart" (Psalm civ., 15).
In devoting anything to religious purposes, the anointing with
oil was considered as a necessary part of the ceremony, a rite
which has descended to Christian nations. The tabernacle in the
wilderness, and all its holy vessels, were, by God's express command,
anointed with oil; Aaron and his two sons were set apart for the
priesthood with the same ceremony ; and the prophets and kings
of Israel were consecrated to their offices by the same rite.
Hence, Freemasons' Lodges, which are but
temples to the Most High, are consecrated to the sacred purposes
for which they were built by strewing corn , wine, and oil upon
the Lodge, the emblem of the Holy Ark. Thus does this mystic ceremony
instruct us to be nourished with the hidden manna of righteousness,
to be refreshed with the Word of the Lord, and to rejoice with
joy unspeakable in the riches of divine grace. "Wherefore,
my brethren," says the venerable Harris (Discourse iv, 81),
"wherefore do you carry corn, wine, and oil in your processions,
but to remind you that in the pilgrimage of human life you are
to impart a portion of your bread to feed the hungry, to send
a cup of your wine to cheer the sorrowful, and to pour the healing
oil of your consolation into the wounds which sickness hath made
in the bodies, or afflictions rent in the heart, of your fellow-travelers?"
In processions, the corn alone is carried
in a golden pitcher, the wine and oil are placed in silver vessels,
and this is to remind us that the first, as a necessity and the
"staff of life," is of more importance and more worthy
of honor than the others, which are but comforts.
CORONET, DUCAL
Italian, Coronetta. An inferior crown worn
by noblemen; that of a British duke is adorned with strawberry
leaves; that of a marquis has leaves with pearls interposed; that
of an earl has the pearls above the leaves ; that of a viscount
is surrounded with pearls only; that of a baron has only four
pearls. The ducal coronet is a prominent symbol in the Thirty-third
Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite.
CORPORATION OF SQUAREMEN
See Squaremen, Corporation of
CORRESPONDENCE
See Committee on Foreign Correspondence
CORRESPONDING GRAND SECRETARY
An officer of a Grand Lodge to whom was
formerly entrusted, in some Grand Lodges, the Foreign Correspondence
of the Body. The office is now disused, a temporary appointment
being made when familiarity with a foreign language may require
the services of an assistant to the Grand Secretary.
CORYBANTES, MYSTERIES OF
Rites instituted in Phrygia in honor of
Atys, the lover of Cybele. The goddess was supposed first to bewail
the death of her lover, and afterward to rejoice for his restoration
to life. The ceremonies were a scenical representation of this
alternate lamentation and rejoicing, and of the sufferings of
Atys, who was placed in an ark or coffin during the mournful part
of the orgies. If the description of these rites, given by Sainte-Croix
from various ancient authorities, be correct, they were but a
modification of the Eleusinian mysteries.
COSMIST
A religious faith of late recognition, having
for its motto, Deeds, not Creeds, and for its principle the service
of humanity is the supreme duty.
The design of Cosmism is to join all men
and women into one family, in which the principle of equality,
together with that of brotherly love, that is, love of the human
race, is the predominant one, and the moral and material welfare
of all, the sole aim and purpose.
The Cosmists are enjoined to act as follows:
To give one another encouragement and aid, both material and moral,
to cultivate all their faculties, to contemplate all mankind as
Brethren; to be courteous and forbearing to each and all; to practice
charity without publicity or ostentation. Freemasonry is an intensely
theistical institution; but its principles could scarcely be better
expressed than tho se above enumerated as the foundation of the
Cosmistic faith; more especially in the motto, Deeds, not Creeds.
COSMOPOLITE
The Third Degree of the Second Temple of
the Rite of African Architects, which see in this Encyclopedia.
COSTA RICA
The most southern state of Central America.
The first Masonic Lodge in Costa Rica was instituted by the Grand
Orient of New Granada at San José in 1867. On December
7, 1899, the Grand Lodge was formed at San José. Oliver
Day Street, in his Report on Correspondence to the Grand Lodge
of Alabama, 1922 states: "This Grand Lodge must be moribund,
if not defunct, as after repeated efforts this scribe has not
been able to get into communication with it. Not a word has been
received from it during the seven years he has been Foreign Correspondent."
The Grand Lodge is credited by the Annuaire in 1923 as having
seven Lodges, with 206 members, three Lodges being at San José
and one each at Port Limon and Alajuela being named. Nos. 5 and
6 not located.
COUNCIL
In several of the advance Degrees of Freemasonry
the meetings are styled Councils; as, a Council of Royal and Select
Masters, or Princes of Jerusalem, or Companions of the Red Cross
COUNCIL CHAMBER
A part of the room in which the ceremonies
of the Companions of the Red Cross are performed.
COUNCIL, GRAND
See Grand Council
COUNCIL OF ALLIED MASONIC DEGREES
An organization formed in England in 1880
to embosom, protect, and promulgate all side Degrees of a Masonic
or other secret character, and those otherwise unclaimed that
may appear as waifs. The central organization is termed the Grand
Council of Allied Masonic Degrees.
The Sovereign College of the Allied Masonic Degrees of America
was organized on February 1, l892, at Richmond, Virginia, and
the first officers of this Body were chosen as follows:
Hartley Carmichael, 33 , Sovereign Grand Master.
Wm. Ryan, 33 , Deputy Grand Master, C.J.S.
Right Rev. A. M. Randolph, Bishop of Southern Virginia, Grand
Abbot
Frederick Webber, 33 , Grand Senior Warden
Alfred R. Courtney 32 , Grand Junior Warden
W. O. English, 32 , K.C. , Grand Chancellor.
Charles A. Nesbitt, 33 , Grand Recorder-General,
John F. Mayer. 33 , Grand Bursar.
Josiah Drummond, 33 , Grand Almoner.
R. P. Williams. 33 , Grand Prefect of Rites.
Beverly R. Welford, Jr. 32 , Grand Magister non regens
R. H. Hall, 33 , Grand Deacon.
O. W. Budd, 32 , S. Fellow.
Thomas Whittet, 33 , Grand Verger.
Jacob Reinhardt, 32 , Grand Chief of Musisians.
Ernest T. Walthall, Grand Printer.
H. F. W, Southern, 32 , Grand Tiler.
Brother Nesbitt, the Grand Recorder-General
who was also Grand Secretary, Grand Lodge of Virginia, was elected
Deputy Grand Master of the Sovereign College in 1901, Brother
Howard D. Smith, Norway, Maine, at the same time being chosen
Grand Recorder-General. This Sovereign College was organized for
the purpose of uniting under Masonic government a number of Degrees
hitherto not so controlled. The object of the Sovereign College
was two-fold-to work with proper rituals such as were, from their
importance or beauty, worthy of propagation, and to lay on the
shelf such Degrees, possessed by it, as were merely Masonic absurdities.
This Grand Body assumed the care of several Degrees of interest
and importance to earnest and progressive Freemasons. It governs
the Ark Mariner or Ark and Doye, Secret Monitor, Saint Lawrence
the Martyr, Tilers of King Solomon, Knights of Constantinople,
the Holy Order of Wisdom, and the Trinitiam Knights of Saint John
of Patmos. From the archives we obtain the following particulars;
For the Degree of Ark Mariner all Master
Masons in good standing are eligible, and all Ark Mariners are
eligible for the Monitor Degree. The Ark Degree ought to be possessed
by every well-equipped Freemason. In England the synonymous Degree
of Royal Ark Mariner is exceedingly popular. Though it is not
necessary in America to possess the Mark Degree before receiving
that of the Ark, yet it is well for all Freemasons, who are likely
to travel, to take the Mark Degree in the Chapter also,-as the
qualification for the English Royal Ark Mariner's Degree is that
the candidate must be a Mark Mason. The Degrees of Tiler of Solomon,
Saint Lawrence the Martyr, and the Knight of Constantinople are
only conferred on those who are already Ark Mariners and Secret
Monitors.
The Holy Order of Wisdom is one of the finest
and most impressive Degrees in Freemasonry. The qualification
is that the candidate must be a Knight Templar of the American
Rite, or a. Knight Rose Croix of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish
Rite.
The Knight of Patmos is conferred only once
a year, and then sparingly. It is given only to Freemasons of
some mark and learning.
From the Knights of Patmos the officers
of the Sovereign College are elected.
The Degrees of the Order of Wisdom, and
the Knight of Patmos, are essentially Christian and Trinitarian.
For the latter Degree the Candidate must be a Prince of the Royal
secret of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite.
The Grand Bodies with which the Sovereign
College is in amity:
In the Ark Mariner Degree: In England, The
Royal Ark Council of England. In Scotland, The Supreme Royal Arch
Chapter of Scotland.
In the other Degrees, in England, The Grand
Council Of Allied Masonic Degrees for England, Wales and the Colonies
and Dependencies of the British Crown. In Scotland, The Grand
Council of Allied Masonic Degrees for Scotland.
The Festival of the Order is Saint Paul's
Day. The Prayer Book Commentary (Maemillan, 1922, page 26) says,
"In the ease of Saint Paul we have the festival of his conversion,
January 25, commemorating an event standing on a totally different
footing from every other conversion, which was divinely destined
to alter the whole tone of Christianity,. Our earliest notices
of this festival carry it, we believe, to about the middle of
the ninth century."
COUNCIL OF COMPANIONS OF THE RED CROSS
A body in which the First Degree of the
Templar system in the United States of America is conferred. It
is held under the Charter of a Commandery of Knights Templar,
which, when meeting as a Council, is composed of the following
officers: A Sovereign Master, Chancellor, Master of the Palace,
Prelate, Master of Despatches, Master of Cavalry, Master of Infantry,
Standard-Bearer, Sword-Bearer, Warder and Sentinel.
COUNCIL OF ROYAL AND SELECT MASTERS
United Body conferring Royal and Select
Degrees. In some Jurisdictions this Council confers also the Degree
of a Super-Excellent Master.
COUNCIL OF ROYAL MASTERS
The Body in which the Degree of Royal Master,
the eighth in the American Rite, is conferred. It receives its
Charter from a Grand Council of Royal and Select Masters, and
has the following officers: Thrice Illustrious Grand Master, Illustrious
Hiram of Tyre, Principal Conductor of the Works, Master of the
Exchequer, Master of Finances, Captain of the Guards, Conductor
of the Council, and Steward.
COUNCIL OF SELECT MASTERS
The body in which the Degree of Select Masters,
the ninth in the American Rite, is conferred. It receives its
Charter from a Grand Council of Royal and Select Masters. Its
officers are: Thrice Illustrious Grand Master, Illustrious Hiram
of Tyre, Principal Conductor of the Works, Treasurer, Recorder,
Captain of the Guards, Conductor of the Council, and Steward.
COUNCIL OF THE TRINITY
An independent Masonic Jurisdiction, in
which are conferred the Degrees of Knight of the Christian Mark,
and Guard of the Conclave, Knight of the Holy Sepulcher, and the
Holy and Thrice Illustrious Order of the Cross. They are conferred
after the Encampment Degrees. They are Christian Degrees, and
refer to the crucifixion.
COUNCIL, SUPREME
See Supreme Council
COUNTRY STEWARDS' LODGE
An old English Lodge which met first at
the Guildhall Coffee House and afterwards at Freemasons Tavern.
It was known as No. 540, having been constituted in 1789. The
members were made up of Freemasons who had served as Stewards
at the "Country Feast of the Society," a festival held
every several years after 1732. A special jewel with a green collar
was assigned for their use by the Grand Lodge in 1789 and in 1795
they were permitted to line their aprons with green silk. As a
result of this ruling they were frequently called the Green Apron
Lodge, but in 1797 this ruling was withdrawn. The Lodge lapsed
about 1802.
COURT DE GEBELIN, ANTOINE
French author; a founder of the Rite des
Philaletes in 1773; Secretary of the famous Lodge of Nine Sisters,
Paris. in 1779. President of the Apolionian Society and author
of Primitive World Analyzed and Compared with the Modern World.
Although a Protestant his literary work secured for him the office
of Royal Censor. At the time Voltaire was initiated into the Lodge
of Nine Sisters, Court de Gebelin assisted and also presented
a copy of his new book mentioned above and read that part of it
concerning the ancient mysteries of Eleusis. He died in 1784 (see
Lodge of Nine Sisters).
COURT OF HONOR
The letters K.C.C.H., stand for Knight Commander
of the Court of Honor. The Court of Honor is an honorary body
between the Thirty-second and Thirty-third Degrees of the Southern
Jurisdiction, Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. It was established
to confer honor on certain Brethren whose zeal and work for Scottish
Rite Freemasonry have entitled them to recognition. This Court
of Honor is composed of all Thirty-third Degree Freemasons whether
active or honorary, and also such Thirty-second Degree Freemasons
as the Supreme Council may select. In the Court of Honor there
are two ranks, that of Knight Commander and that of Grand Cross.
No more than three Grand Crosses can be selected at each regular
session of the Supreme Council, but the Knight Commander rank
is not so restricted. At least two weeks before each regular session
of the Supreme Council, each active Thirty-third Degree member
may nominate one Thirty-second Degree member for the honor and
decoration of Knight Commander.
In addition to this he is entitled to nominate
for this honor one candidate for every forty Freemasons of the
Fourteenth Degree in his Jurisdiction, who has received that Degree
since the preceding regular session of the Supreme Council. This
does not mean that a Fourteenth Degree Freemason is entitled to
the honor.
On the contrary, the honor can only be conferred
on one who has received the Thirty-second Degree at least two
years prior to his nomination, but the number of such Thirty-second
Degree Freemasons who may receive the honor is limited by the
number of those who have received the Fourteenth Degree in the
Jurisdiction of the member making the nomination. However, if
in the judgment of the Supreme Council there are others not so
nominated who should receive the honor, the Supreme Council may
elect without such nomination. The rank of Knight Commander or
Grand Cross cannot be applied for and if applied for, must be
refused. The Court of Honor assembles as a body when called to
gather by the Grand Commander, and is presided over by the Grand
Cross named by the Grand Commander.
COURTESY
Politeness of manners, as the result of
kindness of disposition, was one of the peculiar characteristics
of the knights of old. "No other human laws enforced,"
says M. de Saint Palaye, "as chivalry did, sweetness and
modesty of temper, and that politeness which the word courtesy
was meant perfectly to express" We find, therefore, in the
language of Templarism, the phrase "a true and courteous
knight" ; and Knights Templar are in the habit of closing
their letters to each other with the expression, Yours in all
knightly courtesy. Courtesy is also a Masonic virtue, because
it is the product of a feeling of kindness; but it is not so specifically
spoken of in the symbolic degrees, where brotherly love assumes
its place, as it is in the orders of knighthood.
COUSINS, LES BONS
or COUSINS CHARBONNIERS.
A secret society of France in the eighteenth
century (see Carbonari).
COUSTOS, JOHN
The sufferings inflicted, in 1743, by the
Inquisition at Lisbon, on John Coustos, a Freemason, and the Master
of a Lodge in that city; and the fortitude with which he endured
the severest tortures, rather than betray his trusts and reveal
the secrets that had been confided to him, constitute an interesting
episode in the history of Freemasonry. Coustos, after returning
to England, published, in 1746, a book, detailing his sufferings,
from which the reader is presented with the folio wing abridged
narrative.
John Coustos was born at Berne, in Switzerland, but emigrated,
in 1716, with his father to England, where he became a naturalized
subject. In1743 he removed to Lisbon, in Portugal, and began
the practice of his profession, which was that of a lapidary or
dealer in precious stones. In consequence of the bull or edict
of Pope-Clement XXII denouncing the Masonic Institution, the Lodges
at Lisbon were not held at public houses, as was the custom in
England and other Protestant countries, but privately, at the
residences of the members. Of one of these Lodges, Coustos, who
was a zealous Freemason, was elected the Master. A female, who
was cognizant of the existence of the Lodge over which Coustos
presided, revealed the circumstance to her confessor, declaring
that, in her opinion, the members were "monsters in nature,
who perpetrated the most shocking crimes." In consequence
of this information, it was resolved, by the Inquisition, that
Coustos should be arrested and subjected to the tender mercies
of the Holy Office. He was accordingly seized, a few nights afterwards,
in a coffee-house--- the public pretense of the arrest being that
he was privy to the stealing of a diamond, of which they had falsely
accused another jeweler, friend and warden of Coustos, whom they
had previously arrested. Coustos was then carried to the prison
of the Inquisition, and after having been searched and deprived
of all his money, papers, and other things that he had about him,
he was led to a lonely dungeon, in which he was immured, being
expressly forbidden to speak aloud or knock against the walls,
but if he required anything, to beat with a padlock that hung
on the outward door, and which he could reach by thrusting his
arm through the iron grate. "It was there," says he,
"that, struck with the horrors of a place of which I had
heard and read such baleful descriptions, I plunged at once into
the blackest melancholy; especially when I reflected on the dire
consequences with which my confinement might very possibly be
attended."
On the next day he was led, bareheaded,
before the President and four Inquisitors, who, after having made
him reply on oath to several questions respecting his name, his
parentage, his place of birth, his religion, and the time he had
resided in Lisbon, exhorted him to make a full confession of all
the crimes he had ever committed in the whole course of his life; but, as he refused to make any such confession, declaring that,
from his infancy, he had been taught to confess not to man but
to God, he was again remanded to his dungeon.
Three days after, he was again brought before
the Inquisitors, and the examination was renewed. This was the
first occasion on which the subject of Freemasonry was introduced,
and there Coustos for the first time learned that he had been
arrested and imprisoned solely on account of his connection with
the forbidden Institution.
The result of this conference was that Coustos
was conveyed to a deeper dungeon, and kept there in close confinement
for seven weeks, during which period he was taken three times
before the Inquisitors. In the first of these examinations they
again introduced the subject of Freemasonry, and declared that
if the Institution was as virtuous as their prisoner contended
that it was, there was no occasion for concealing so industriously
the secrets of it. Coustos did not reply to this objection to
the Inquisitorial satisfaction, and he was remanded back to his
dungeon, where a few days after he fell sick.
After his recovery, he was again taken before
the Inquisitors, who asked him several new questions with regard
to the tenets of Freemasonry - among others, whether he, since his
abode in Lisbon, had received any Portuguese into the society.
He replied that he had not. When he was next brought before them,
"they insisted," he says, "upon my letting them
into the secrets of Freemasonry; threatening me, in case I did
not comply." But Coustos firmly and fearlessly refused to
violate his obligations.
After several other interviews, in which
the effort was unavailingly made to extort from him a renunciation
of Freemasonry, he was subjected to the torture, of which he gives
the following account:
I was instantly conveyed to the torture-room,
built in form of a square tower, where no light appeared but what
two candles gave; and to prevent the dreadful cries and shocking
groans of the unhappy victims from reaching the ears of the other
prisoners, the doors are lined with a sort of quilt.
The reader will naturally suppose that I
must be seized with horror, when, at my entering this infernal
place, I saw myself, on a sudden, surrounded by six wretches,
who, after preparing the tortures, stripped me naked, all to linen
drawers, when, laying me on my back, they began to lay hold of
every part of my body. First, they put around my neck an iron
collar, which was fastened to the scaffold; they then fixed a
ring to each foot; and this being done, they stretched my limbs
with all their might. They next wound two ropes round each arm,
and two round each thigh, which ropes passed under the scaffold
through holes made for that purpose, and were all drawn tight
at the same time, by four men, upon a signal made for this purpose.
The reader will believe that my pains must
be intolerable, when I solemnly declare that these ropes, which
were of the size of one's little finger, pierced through my flesh
quite to the bone, making the blood gush out at eight different
places that were thus bound. As I persisted in refusing to discover
any more than what has been seen in the interrogatories above,
the ropes were thus drawn together four different times. At my'
side stood a physician and a surgeon, who often felt my temples,
to judge of the danger I might be in-by which means my tortures
were suspended, at intervals, that I might have an opportunity
of recovering myself a little Whilst I was thus suffering, they
were so barbarously unjust as to declare, that, were I to die
under the torture, I should be guilty, by my obstinacy, of self-murder.
In fine, the last time the ropes were drawn tight, I grew so exceedingly
weak, occasioned by the blood's circulation being stopped, and
the pains I endured, that I fainted quite away; insomuch that
I was carried back to my dungeon, without perceiving it.
These barbarians, finding that the tortures
above described could not extort any further discovery from me;
but that, the more they made me suffer, the more fervently I addressed
my supplications, for patience, to heaven. they were so inhuman,
six weeks after, as to expose me to another kind of torture, more
grievous, if possible, than the former. They made me stretch my
arms in such a manner that the palms of my hands were turned outward;
when, by the help of a rope that fastened them together at the
wrist, and which they turned by an engine, they drew them gently
nearer to one another behind, in such a manner that the back of
each hand touched and stood exactly parallel one to another; whereby
both my shoulders were dislocated, and a considerable quantity
of blood issued from my mouth.
This torture was repeated thrice; after
which I was again taken to my dungeon, and put into the hands
of physicians and surgeons, who, in setting my bones, put me to
exquisite pain. Two months after, being a little recovered, I
was again conveyed to the torture-room, and there made to undergo
another kind of punishment twice. The reader may judge of its
horror, from the following description thereof :
" The torturers turned twice around
my body a thick iron chain, which, crossing upon my stomach, terminated
afterwards at my wrists. They next set my back against a thick
board, at each extremity whereof was a pulley, through which there
ran a rope, that caught the ends of the chains at my wrists. The
tormentors then stretched these ropes, by means of a roller, pressed
or bruised my stomach, in proportion as the means were drawn tighter.
They tortured me on this occasion to such a degree, that my wrists
and shoulders were put out of joint. The surgeons, however, set
them presently after; but the barbarians not yet having satiated
their cruelty, made me undergo this torture a second time, which
I did with fresh pains, though with equal consistency and resolution.
I was then remanded back to my dungeon, attended by the surgeons,
who dressed my bruises; and here I continued until their auto-da-fé,
or gaol delivery.
On that occasion, he was sentenced to work at
the galleys for four years.
Soon, however, after he had commenced the
degrading occupation of a galley slave, the injuries which he
had received during his inquisitorial tortures having so much
impaired his health, that he was unable to undergo the toils to
which he had been condemned, he was sent to the infirmary, where
he remained until October, 1744, when he was released upon the
demand of the British minister, as a subject to the King of England.
He was, however, ordered to leave the country. This, it may be
supposed, he gladly did, and repaired to London, where he published
the account of his sufferings in a book entitled The Sufferings
of John Coustos for Freemasonry, and for refusing to turn Roman
Catholic, in the Inquisition at Lisbon, etc., etc. London, 1746;
8vo , 400 pages. This work was reprinted at Birmingham in 1790.
Such a narrative is well worthy of being read. John Coustos has
not, by his literary researches, added anything to the learning
or science of our Order; yet, by his fortitude and fidelity under
the severest sufferings, inflicted to exhort from him a knowledge
he was bound to conceal, he has shown that Freemasonry makes no
idle boast in declaring that its secrets "are locked up in
the depository of faithful breasts."
COUVREUR
The title of an officer in a French Lodge,
equivalent to the English Tiler.
COUVRIR LE TEMPLE
A French expression for the English one
to close the Lodge. But it has also another signification. To
cover the Temple to a Brother, means in French Masonic language,
to exclude him from the Lodge.
COVENANT OF FREEMASONRY
As a covenant is defined to be a contract
or agreement between two or more parties on certain terms, there
can be no doubt that when a man is made a Freemason he enters
into a covenant with the Institution. On his part he promises
to fulfil certain promises, and to discharge certain duties, for
which, on the other part, the Fraternity bind themselves by an
equivalent covenant of friendship, protection, and support. This
covenant must of course be repeated and modified with every extension
of the terms of agreement on both sides.
The covenant of an Entered Apprentice is
different from that of a Fellow Craft, and the covenant of the
latter from that of a Master Mason. As we advance in Freemasonry
our obligations increase, but the covenant of each Degree is not
the less permanent or binding because that of a succeeding one
has been super-added. The second covenant does not impair the
sanctity of the first.
This covenant of Freemasonry is symbolized
and sanctioned by the most important and essential of all the
ceremonies of the Institution. It is the very foundation-stone
which supports the whole edifice, and, unless it be properly laid,
no superstructure can with any safety be erected. It is indeed
the covenant that makes the Freemason.
A master so important as this, in establishing
the relationship of a Freemason with the Craft-this baptism, so
to speak, by which a member is inaugurated into the Institution-must
of course be attended with the most solemn and binding ceremonies.
Such has been the case in all countries. Covenants have always
been solemnized with certain solemn forms and religious observances
which gave them a sacred sanction in the minds of the contracting
parties. The Hebrews, especially, invested their covenants with
the most imposing ceremonies.
The first mention of a covenant in form
that is met with in Scripture is that recorded in the fifteenth
chapter of Genesis, where, to confirm it, Abraham, in obedience
to the Divine command, took a heifer, a she-goat, and a ram, "and
divided them in the midst, and laid each piece one against another"
(see Genesis v, 10). This dividing a victim into two parts, that
the covenanting parties might pass between them, was a custom
not confined to the Hebrews, but borrowed from them by all the
heathen nations.
In the Book of Jeremiah it is again alluded
to , and the penalty for the violation of the covenant is also
expressed.
And I will give the men that have transgressed
my covenant, which have not performed the words of the covenant
which they had made before me, when they cut the calf in twain,
and passed between the parts thereof.
The princes of Judah, and the princes of
Jerusalem, the eunuchs, and the priests, and all the people of
the land which passed between the parts of the calf.
I will even give them into the hand of their
enemies, and into the hand of them that seek their live; and their
dead bodies shall be for meat unto the fowls of the heaven, and
to the beasts of the earth" (Jeremiah xxxiv, 18, 19, 20).
These ceremonies, thus briefly alluded to
in the passages which have been quoted, were performed in full,
as follows. The attentive Masonic student will observe the analogies
to those of his own Order.
The parties entering into a covenant first
selected a proper animal, such as a calf or a kid among the Jews,
a sheep among the Greeks, or a pig among the Romans. The throat
was then cut across, with a single blow, so as to completely divide
the windpipe and arteries, without to touching the bone. This
was the first ceremony of the covenant. The second was, to tear
open the breast, to take from thence the heart and vitals, and
if on inspection the least imperfection was discovered, the body
was considered unclean, and thrown aside for another. The third
ceremony was to divide the body in twain, and to place the two
parts to the north and south, so that the parties to the covenant
might pass between them, coming from the east and going to the
west. The carcass was then left as a prey to the wild beasts of
the field and the vultures of the air, and thus the covenant was
ratified (see Hand, also Oath and Penalty).
COVERING OF THE LODGE
As the lectures tell us that our ancient
Brethren met on the highest hills and lowest vales, from this
it is inferred that, as the meetings were thus in the open air,
the only covering must have been the overarching vault of heaven.
Hence, in the symbolism of Freemasonry the covering of the Lodge
is said to be a clouded canopy or starry-decked heaven. The terrestrial
Lodge of labor is thus intimately connected with the celestial
Lodge of eternal refreshment. The symbolism is still further extended
to remind us that the whole world is a Freemason's Lodge, and
heaven its sheltering cover.
COWAN
This is a purely Masonic term, and signifies
in its technical meaning an intruder, whence it is always coupled
with the word eavesdropper. It is not found in any of the old
manuscripts of the English Freemasons anterior to the eighteenth
century, unless we suppose that lowen, met with in many of them,
is a clerical error of the copyists. It occurs in the Schaw Manuscript,
a Scotch record which bears the date of 1598, in the following
passage: "That no Master or Fellow of Craft receive any cowans
to work in his society or company, nor send none of his servants
to work with cowans." In the second edition of Anderson's
Constitutions, published in 1738 (page 146), we find the word
in use among the English Freemasons, thus : ''But Free and Accepted
Masons shall not allow cowans to work with them ; nor shall they
be employed by cowans without an urgent necessity; and even in
that case they must not reach cowans, but must have a separate
communication." There can be but little doubt that the word,
as a Masonic term, comes to us from Scotland, and it is therefore
in the Scotch language that we must look for its signification.
Now, Jamieson, in his Scottish Dictionary, gives us the following
meanings of the word: Cowans.
l. A term of contempt ; applied to one who
does the work of a mason, but has not been regularly bred.
2. Also used to denote one who builds dry walls, otherwise denominated
a dry diker.
3. One unacquainted with the secrets of Freemasonry.
And he gives the following examples as his
authorities:
A boat-carpenter, joiner, cowan (or builder of stone without mortar),
get ls. at the minimum and good maintenance. P. Morven, Argyles.
Statistic, Acct., X, 267. N.
Cowans. Masons who build dry-stone dikes
or walls. P. Halkirk, Carthn, Statistic. Acct., XIX, 24. N.
In
the Rob Roy of Scott, the word is used by Allan Inverach, who
says:
She does not value a Cawmill mair as a cowan.
The word has therefore, in the opinion of
Brother Mackey, come to the English Fraternity directly from the
Operative Freemasons of Scotland, among whom it was used to denote
a pretender, in the exact sense of the first meaning of Jamieson.
There is no word that has given Masonic
scholars more trouble than this in tracing its derivation. By
some it has been considered to come from the Greek meaning a dog;
and referred to the fact that in the early ages of the Church,
when the mysteries of the new religion were communicated only
to initiates under the veil of secrecy, infidels were called dogs,
a term probably suggested by such passages as (Matthew vii 6),
"Give not that which is holy unto the dogs"; or (Philippians
iii 2), "Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of
the concision'' (see also Revelations xxii 15). This derivation
has been adopted by Oliver, and many other writers.
Jamieson's derivations are from the old
Swedish kujon, kuzhjohn, meaning a silly fellow, and the French
coion, coyon, signifying a coward, a base fellow. No matter how
we get the word, it seems always to convey an idea of contempt.
The attempt to derive it from the chouans of the French Revolution
is manifestly absurd, for it has been shown that the word was
in use long before the French Revolution was even meditated.
However, Brother Hawkins points out that
Doctor Murray in the New English Dictionary says that the derivation
of the word is unknown.
Notwithstanding the above reference by Brother
Hawkins we may venture to consider another objective.
There is a possibility of the word common presenting an explanation
of our word cowan. Common is found frequently in use by the trade
Gilds. Usually it means the citizens as a body. Today the English
Commons is the assembled representatives of the people.
Several instances of its use are to be found
in Jupps' History of the Carpenters Company. Sometimes it is spelled
Coen and then Comon, and so on as the habit or fancy of the writer
moved him. About half a dozen of them are given in the book by
Jupp.
To the Masonic student of philology we would
submit these considerations as it is just possible that cowan
is but a variant of common. Workmen raised by a skilled knowledge
of their trade above the ordinary level could not directly stigmatize
those not in their class by any more descriptive word than that
which briefly scored them as of merely ordinary qualifications.
Do the contemptuous not still so speak of the common herd, and
has not the outraged "cullud pussun" been reported by
the freely descriptive novelist as retorting on occasion with
the saying of "common white trash?"
COWPER, WILLIAM
Deputy Grand Master, 1726-7, under Lord
Inchiquin.
CRAFT
It is from the Saxon craft, which indirectly
signifies skill or dexterity in any art. In reference to this
skill, therefore, the ordinary acceptation is a trade or mechanical
art, and collectively, the persons practicing it. Hence, the Craft,
in Speculative Freemasonry, signifies the whole body of Freemasons,
wherever dispersed.
CRAFT MASONRY, ANCIENT
See Ancient Craft Masonry
CRAFTED
A word sometimes colloquially used, instead
of the Lodge term passed, to designate the advancement of a candidate
to the Second Degree.
CRAFTSMAN
A Freemason. The word originally meant anyone
skillful in his art, and is so used by our early writers. Thus
Chaucer, in his Knights' Tale (v 1897), says:
For in the land there was no craftsman,
That geometry or arsmetrike can,
Nor pourtrayor, nor carver of images,
That Theseus ne gave him meat and wages.
The theatre to make and to devise.
CRAFTSMEN, CLEVELAND FEDERATION OF
See Universal Craftsmen Council of Engineers
CRATA REPOA
See Egyptian Priests, Initiations of the.
CREATE
In chivalry, when anyone received the order
of knighthood, he was said to be created a knight. The word dub
had also the same meaning. The word created is used in Commanderies
of Knights Templar to denote the elevation of a candidate to that
Degree (see Dub).
CREATION
Preston (Illustrations of Masonry, Book
I, Section 3) says: "From the commencement of the world,
we may trace the foundation of Masonry.
Ever since symmetry began, and harmony displayed
her charms, our Order has had a being." Language like this
has been deemed extravagant, and justly, too , if the words are
to be taken in their literal sense. The idea that the Order of
Freemasonry is coeval with the creation is so absurd that the
pretension cannot need refutation. But the fact is, that Anderson,
Preston, and other writers who have indulged in such statements,
did not mean by the word Masonry anything like an organized Order
or Institution bearing any resemblance to the Freemasonry of the
present day.
They simply meant to indicate that the great
moral principles on which Freemasonry is founded, and by which
it professes to be guided, have always formed a part of the Divine
government, and been presented to man from his first creation
for his acceptance. The words quoted from Preston may be subject
to criticism, because they are liable to misconstruction. But
the symbolic idea which they intended to convey, namely, that
Freemasonry is truth, and that truth is coexistent with man's
creation, is correct, and cannot be disputed.
CREED, A FREEMASON'S
Although Freemasonry is not a dogmatic theology,
and is tolerant in the admission of men of every religious faith,
it would be wrong to suppose that it is without a creed.
On the contrary, it has a creed, the assent
to which it rigidly enforces, and the denial of which is absolutely
incompatible with membership in the Order, This creed consists
of two articles: First, a belief in God, the Creator of all things,
who is therefore recognized as the Great Architect of the Universe; and secondly, a belief in the eternal life, to which this present
life is but a preparatory and probationary state. To the first
of these articles assent is explicitly required as soon as the
threshold of the Lodge is crossed. The second is expressively
taught by legends and symbols, and must be implicitly assented
to by every Freemason, especially by those who have received the
Third Degree, which is altogether founded on the doctrine of the
resurrection to a second life.
At the revival of Freemasonry in 1717, the
Grand Lodge of England set forth the law, as to the religious
creed to be required of a Freemason, in the following words, to
be found in the Charges approved by that body.
In ancient times, Masons were charged in
every country to be of the religion of that country or nation,
whatever it was; yet it is now thought more expedient only to
oblige them to that religion in which all men agree, leaving their
particular opinions to themselves (see Constitutions, 1723, page
50). This is now considered universally as the recognized law
on the subject.
CRESSET
An open lamp formerly having a crosspiece
filled with combustible material, such as naphtha, and recognized
as the symbol of Light and Truth.
CREUZER, GEORG FRIEDERICH
George Frederick Creuzer, who was born in
Germany in 1771, and was a professor at the University of Heidelberg,
devoted himself to the study of the ancient religions, and, with
profound learning, established a peculiar system on the subject.
His theory was, that the religion and mythology of the ancient
Greeks were borrowed from a far more ancient people - -a body
of priests coming from the East-who received them as a revelation.
The myths and traditions of this ancient people were adopted by
Hesiod, Homer, and the later poets, although not without some
misunderstanding of them ; and they were finally preserved in
the Mysteries, and became subjects of investigation for the philosophers.
This theory Creuzer has developed in his most important work,
entitled Symbolik und Archäologie der alten Völker,
besonders der Griechen, which was published at Leipsic in 1819--21.
There is no translation of this work into English; but Guigniaut
published at Paris, in 1829, a paraphrastic translation of it,
under the title of Religions de l'Antiquité considerées
principalement dans leur Formes Symboliques et Mythologiques (Religions
of Antiquity, considered principally under their Symbolical and
Mythological Forms). Creuzer's views throw much light on the symbolic
history of Freemasonry. He died in1858.
CRIMES, MASONIC
In Freemasonry, every offense is a crime,
because, in every violation of a Masonic law there is not only
sometimes an infringement of the rights of an individual, but
always, superinduced upon this, a breach and violation of public
rights and duties, which affect the whole community of the Order
considered as a community.
The first class of crimes which are laid
down in the Constitutions, as rendering their perpetrators liable
to Masonic jurisdiction, are offenses against the moral law. "Every
Mason," says the Old Charges of 1722, "is obliged by
his tenure to obey the moral law." The same charge continues
the precept by asserting, that if he rightly understands the art,
he will never be a stupid atheist, nor an irreligious libertine.
Atheism, therefore, which is a rejection of a supreme, superintending
Creator, and irreligious libertinism, which, in the language of
that day, signified a denial of all moral responsibility, are
offenses against the moral law, because they deny its validity
and contemn its sanctions ; and hence they are to be classed as
Masonic crimes.
Again: the moral law inculcates love of
God, love , of our neighbor, and duty to ourselves. Each of these
embraces other incidental duties which are obligatory on every
Freemason, and the violation of any one of which constitutes a
Masonic crime.
The love of God implies that we should abstain
from all profanity and irreverent use of his name. Universal benevolence
is the necessary result of love of our neighbor. Cruelty to one's
inferiors and dependents, uncharitableness to the poor and needy,
and a general misanthropical neglect of our duty as men to our
fellow-beings, exhibiting itself in extreme selfishness and indifference
to the comfort or happiness of all others, are offenses against
the moral law, and therefore Masonic crimes.
Next to violations of the moral law, in
the category of Masonic crimes, are to be considered the transgressions
of the municipal law, or the law of the land.
Obedience to constituted authority is one
of the first duties which is impressed upon the mind of the candidate;
and hence he who transgress the laws of the government under which
he lives violates the teachings of the Order, and is guilty of
a Masonic crime.
But the Order will take no cognizance of
ecclesiastical or political offenses. And this arises from the
very nature of the society, which eschews all controversies about
national religion or state policy. Hence apostasy, heresy, and
schisms, although considered in some governments as heinous offenses,
and subject to severe punishment, are not viewed as Masonic crimes
Lastly, violations of the Landmarks and Regulations of the Order
are Masonic crimes. Thus, disclosure of any of the secrets which
a Freemason has promised to conceal; disobedience and want of
respect to Masonic superiors; the bringing of "private piques
or quarrels" into, the Lodge; want of courtesy and kindness
to the Brethren ; speaking calumniously of a Freemason behind
his back, or in any other way attempting to injure him, as by
striking him except in self-defense, or violating his domestic
honor, is each a crime in Freemasonry. Indeed, whatever is a violation
of fidelity to solemn engagements, a neglect of prescribed duties,
or a transgression of the cardinal principles of friendship, morality,
and brotherly love, is a Masonic crime.
CRIMSON
Crimoysin is Old English. A deep-red color
tinged with blue, emblematical of fervency and zeal; belonging
to several degrees of the Scottish Rite as well as to the Holy
Royal Arch.
CROMLECH
A large stone resting on two or more stones,
like a table. Cromlechs are found in Brittany, Denmark, Germany,
and some other parts of Europe, and are supposed to have been
used in the Celtic Mysteries.
CROMWELL
The Abb Larudan published at Amsterdarn,
in 1746, a book entitled Les Francs Maçons Ecrasés,
meaning the Freemasons Crushed, of which Klos says in his Bibliographie
der Freimaurerei No. 1874, that it is the armory from which all
the abuse of Freemasonry by its enemies has been derived.
Larudan was the first to advance in this
book the theory that Oliver Cromwell was the founder of Freemasonry.
He says that Cromwell established the Order for the furtherance
of his political designs; adopting with this view, as its governing
principles, the doctrines of liberty and equality, and bestowed
upon its members the title of Freemasons, because his object was
to engage them in the building of a new edifice, that is to say,
to reform the human race by the extermination of kings and all
regal powers. He selected for this purpose the design of rebuilding
the Temple of Solomon. This Temple, erected by Divine command,
had been the sanctuary of religion. After years of glory and magnificence,
it had been destroyed by a formidable army. The people who there
worshiped had been conveyed to Babylon, whence, after enduring
a rigorous captivity, they had been permitted to return to Jerusalem
and rebuild the Temple. This history of the Solomonic Temple Cromwell
adopted, says Larudan, as an allegory on which to found his new
Order. The Temple in its original magnificence was man in his
primeval state of purity; its destruction and the captivity of
its worshipers typified pride and ambition, which have abolished
equality and introduced dependence among men; and the Chaldean
destroyers of the glorious edifice are the kings who have trodden
on an oppressed people.
It was, continues the Abbé, in the
year 1648 that Cromwell, at an entertainment given by him to some
of his friends, proposed to them, in guarded terms, the establishment
of a new society, which should secure a true worship of God, and
the deliverance of man from oppression and tyranny. The proposition
was received with unanimous favor; and a few days after, at a
house in King Street, and at six o'clock in the evening, for the
Abbé is particular as to time and place, the Order of Freemasonry
was organized, its Degrees established, its ceremonies and ritual
prescribed, and several of the adherents of the future Protector
initiated.
The Institution was used by Cromwell for
the advancement of his projects, for the union of the contending
parties in England, for the extirpation of the monarchy, and his
own subsequent elevation to supreme power. It extended from England
into other countries, but was always careful to preserve the same
doctrines of equality and liberty among men, and opposition to
all monarchical government.
Such is the theory of the Abbé Larudan,
who, although a bitter enemy of Freemasonry, writes with seeming
farness and mildness. But it is hardly necessary to say that this
theory of the origin of Freemasonry finds no support either in
the legends of the Institution, or in the authentic history that
is connected with its rise and progress.
CROMWELL, THOMAS, EARL OF ESSEX
Doctor Anderson says that Thomas Cromwell
was Grand Master of England, 1534-40 (see also William Preston's
Illustrations of Masonry, section iv).
CROSIER
The staff surmounted by a cross carried
before a bishop on occasions of solemn ceremony. They are generally
gilt, and made light; frequently of tin, and hollow. The pastoral
staff has a circular head.
CROSS
We can find no symbolism of the cross in
the primitive Degrees of Ancient Craft Masonry. It does not appear
among the symbols of the Apprentice, the Fellow Craft, the Master,
or the Royal Arch. This is undoubtedly to be attributed to the
fact that the cross was considered, by those who invented those
Degrees, only in reference to its character as a Christian sign.
The subsequent archeological investigations that have given to
the cross a more universal place in iconography were unknown to
the old rituals. It is true, that it is referred to, under the
name of the rode or rood, in a manuscript of the fourteenth century,
published by Halliwell; this was, however, one of the Constitutions
of the Operative Freemasons, who were fond of the symbol, and
were indebted for it to their ecclesiastical origin, and to their
connection with the Gnosties, among whom the cross was a much
used symbol. But on the revival in 1717, when the ritual was remodified,
and differed very greatly from that meager one in practice among
the medieval Freemasons, all allusion to the cross was left out,
because the revivalists laid down the principle that the religion
of Speculative Freemasonry was not sectarian but universal. And
although this principle was in some points, as in the lines parallel,
neglected, the reticence as to the Christian sign of salvation
has continued to the present day so that the cross cannot be considered
as a symbol in the primary and original Degrees of Freemasonry.
But in the advanced Degrees, the cross has
been introduced as an important symbol. In some of them - those
which are to be traced to the Temple system of Ramsay - it is to
be viewed with reference to its Christian origin and meaning.
Thus, in the original Rose Croix and Kadosh-no
matter what may be the modern interpretation given to it - it was
simply a representation of the cross of Christ. In others of a
philosophical character, such as the ineffable Degrees, the symbolism
of the cross was in all probability borrowed from the usages of
antiquity, for from the earliest times and in almost all countries
the cross has been a sacred symbol.
It is depicted on the oldest monuments of
Egypt, Assyria, Persia, and Hindustan.
It was, says Faber (Mysteries of the Cabiri
11, 390), a symbol throughout the Pagan world long previous to
its becoming an object of veneration to Christians.
In ancient symbology it was a symbol of
eternal life.
M. de Mortillet, who, in 1866, published
a work entitled Le Signe de la Croix avant le Christianism (The
Sign of the Cross before Christianity), found in the very earliest
epochs three principal symbols of universal occurrence: namely,
the circle, the pyramid, and the cross. Leslie (Man's 0rigin and
Destiny, page 312) quoting from him in reference to the ancient
worship of the cross, says: "It seems to have been a worship
of such a peculiar nature as to exclude the worship of idols."
This sacredness of the crucial symbol may be one reason why its
form was often adopted, especially by the Celts, in the construction
of their temples.
Of the Druidical veneration of the cross,
Higgins quotes from the treatise of Schedius, De Moribus Germanorum
xxiv, the following remarkable paragraph:
The Druids seek studiously for an oak tree,
large and handsome, growing up with two principal arms in the
form of a cross, beside the main, upright stem. If the two horizontal
arms are not sufficiently adapted to the figure, they fasten a
cross beam to it. This tree they consecrate in this manner. Upon
the right. branch they cut in the bark, in fair characters, the
word Hesus; upon the middle or upright stem, the word Taramis;
upon the left branch, Belenus; over this, above the going off
of the arms, they cut the name of God, Thau. Under all the same
repeated, Thau. This tree, so inscribed, they make their kebla
in the grove, cathedral, or summer church, towards which they
direct their faces in the offices of religion.
Brinton, in his interesting work entitled
Symbolism; The Myths of the New World (page 95) has the following
remarks:
The symbol that beyond all others has fascinated
the human mind, the cross, finds here its source and meaning.
Scholars have pointed out its sacredness in many natural religions,
and have reverently accepted it as a mystery, or offered scores
of conflicting, and often debasing interpretations. it is but
another symbol of the four cardinal points, the four winds of
heaven. This will luminously appear by a study of its use and
meaning in America.
Brinton gives many instances of the religious
use of the cross by several of the aboriginal tribes of this continent,
where the allusion, it must be confessed, seems evidently to be
to the four cardinal points, or the four winds, or four spirits
of the earth. If this be so, and if it is probable that a similar
reference was adopted by the Celtic and other ancient peoples,
then we would have in the cruciform temple as much a symbolism
of the world, of which the four cardinal points constitute the
boundaries, as we have in the square, the cubical, and the circular.
CROSS-BEARING MEN
The Latin is Viri Crucigeri. A name sometimes
assumed by the Rosicrucians. Thus, in the Miracula Naturae of
the year 1619, there is a letter addressed to the Fraternity of
the Rosy Cross, which begins with a Latin phrase: Philesophi Fratres,
Viri Crucigeri, meaning Brother Philosophers, Cross-Bearing Men.
CROSS, DOUBLE
See Cross, Patriarchal
CROSS, JEREMY L
A teacher of the Masonic ritual, who, during
his lifetime, was extensively known, and for some time very popular.
He was born June 27, 1783, at Haverhill, New Hampshire, and died
at the same place in 1861. Cross was admitted into the Masonic
Order in 1808, and soon afterward became a pupil of Thomas Smith
Webb, whose modifications of the Preston lectures and of the advanced
Degrees were generally accepted by the Freemasons of the United
States. Cross, having acquired a competent knowledge of Webb's
system, began to travel and disseminate it throughout the country.
In 1819 he published The True Masonic Chart or Hieroglyphic Monitor,
in which he borrowed liberally from the previous work of Webb.
In fact, the Chart of Cross is, in nearly
all its parts, a mere transcript of the Monitor of Webb, the first
edition of which was published in 1797. Webb, it is true, took
the same liberty with Preston, from whose Illustrations of Masonry
be borrowed largely. The engraving of the emblems constituted,
however, an entirely new and original feature in the Hieroglyphic
Chart, and, as furnishing aids to the memory, rendered the book
of Cross at once very popular; so much so, indeed, that for a
long time it almost altogether superseded that of Webb. In 1820
Cross published The Templars Chart, which, as a monitor of the
Degrees of chivalry, met with equal success. Both of these works
have passed through numerous editions.
Cross received the appointment of Grand
Lecturer from many Grand Lodges, and traveled for many years very
extensively through the United States, teaching his system of
lectures to Lodges, Chapters, Councils, and Encampments.
He possessed few or no scholarly attainments,
and his contributions to the literature of Freemasonry are confined
to the two compilations already cited. In his latter years he
became involved in an effort to establish a Supreme Council of
the Ancient and Accepted Rite. But he soon withdrew his name,
and retired to the place of his nativity, where he died at the
advanced age of seventy-eight.
Although Cross was not a man of any very
original genius, yet a more recent writer has announced the fact
that the symbol in the Third Degree, the broken column, unknown
to the system of either Preston or Webb, was invented by him (see
Monument).
CROSS, JERUSALEM
A Greek cross between four crosslets. It
was adopted by Baldwyn as the arms of the kingdom of Jerusalem,
and has since been deemed a symbol of the Holy Land. It is also
the jewel of the Knights of the Holy Sepulcher. Symbolically,
the four small crosses typify the four wounds of the Savior in
the hands and feet, and the large central cross shows forth his
death for that world to which the four extremities point.
CROSS, MALTESE
A cross of eight points, worn by the Knights
of Malta. It is heraldically described as "a cross pattée,
but the extremity of each pattée notched at a deep angle."
The eight points are said to refer symbolically to the eight beatitudes
(see Matthew v, 3 to II ).
CROSS OF CONSTANTINE
See Labarum
CROSS OF SALEM
Called also the Pontifical Cross, because
it is borne before the Pope. It is a cross, the upright piece
being crossed by three lines, the upper and lower shorter than
the middle one. It is the insignia of the Grand Master and Past
Grand Masters of the Grand Encampment of Knights Templar of the
United States. The same cross placed on a slant is the insignia
of the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Supreme Council of the
Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite.
CROSS, PASSION
The cross on which Jesus suffered crucifixion.
It is the most common form of the cross. When rayonnant, or having
rays issuing from the point of intersection of the limbs, it is
the insignia of the Commander of a Commandery of Knights Templar,
according to the American system.
CROSS, PATRIARCHAL
A cross, the upright piece being twice crossed,
the upper arms shorter than the lower. It is so called because
it is borne before a Patriarch in the Roman Church.
It is the insignia of the officers of the
Grand Encampment of Knights Templar of the United States. The
same cross placed on a slant is the insignia of all possessors
of the Thirty-third Degree in the Ancient and Accepted Scottish
Rite.
CROSS, SAINT ANDREW'S
A saltier or cross whose decussation or
crossing of the arms is in the form of the letter X. Said to be
the form of cross on which Saint Andrew suffered martyrdom. As
he is the patron saint of Scotland, the Saint Andrew's cross forms
a part of the jewel of the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of
Scotland, which is "a star set with brilliants having in
the center a field azure (blue), charged with Saint Andrew on
the cross, gold this is pendant from the upper band of the collar,
while from the lower band is pendant the jewel proper, the Compasses
extended, with the Square and Segment of a Circle of 90, the points
of the Compasses resting on the Segment, and in the center, the
Sun between the Square and Compasses.'' The Saint Andrew's cross
is also the jewel of the Twenty-ninth Degree of the Ancient and
Accepted Scottish Rite, or Grand Scottish Knight of Saint Andrew.
CROSS, TAU
The cross on which Saint Anthony is said
to have suffered martyrdom. It is in the form of the letter T
(see Tau).
CROSS, TEMPLAR
André Favin, a French heraldic writer,
says that the original badge of the Knights Templar was a Patriarchal
Cross, and Clarke, in his History of Knighthood, makes the same
statement, but this is an error. At first, the Templars wore a
white mantle without any cross. But in 1146 Pope Eugenius III
prescribed for them a red cross on their breasts, as a symbol
of the martyrdom to which they were constantly exposed. The cross
of the Hospitalers was white on a black mantle, and that of the
Templars was different in color but of the same form, namely,
a cross pattée, pattée meaning the arms broad and
spreading at the outer ends. In this it differed from the true
Maltese Cross, worn by the Knights of Malta, which was a cross
pattée, the limbs deeply notched so as to make a cross
of eight points. Sir Walter Scott, with his not unusual heraldic
inaccuracy, and Godfrey Higgins, who is not often inaccurate,
but only fanciful at times, both describe the Templar cross as
having eight points, thus confounding it with the Cross of Malta.
In the statutes of the Order of the Temple, the cross prescribed
is that depicted in the Charter of Transmission, and is a cross
pattée.
CROSS, TEUTONIC
The cross formerly worn by the Teutonic
Knights. It is described in heraldry as "a cross potent,
sable (or black), charged with another cross double potent or
(or gald), and surcharged with an escutcheon argent (or silver),
bearing a double-headed eagle sable (or black). " It has
been adopted as the jewel of the Kadosh of the Ancient and Accepted
Scottish Rite in the United States, but the original jewel of
the degree was a Latin or Passion Cross.
CROSS, THRICE ILLUSTRIOUS ORDER OF THE
A Degree formerly conferred in this country
on Knights Templar, but now extinct. Its meetings were called
Councils, and under the authority of a body which styled itself
the Ancient Council of the Trinity.
The Degree is no longer conferred.
CROSS, TRIPLE
See Cross of Salem
CROSSES
In referring to the philosophic triads and
national crosses, there will be found in a work entitled The Celtic
Druids, by Godfrey Higgins, the following: "Few causes have
been more powerful in producing mistakes in ancient history than
the idea, hastily formed by all ages, that every monument of antiquity
marked with a cross, or with any of those symbols which they'
conceived to be monograms of Christ the Savior, was of Christian
origin. The cross is as common in India as in Egypt or Europe."
The Rev. Mr. Maurice remarks (Indian Antiquities):
"Let not the piety of the Catholic Christian be offended
at the assertion that the cross was one of the most usual symbols
of Egypt and India. The emblem of universal nature is equally
honored in the Gentile and Christian world. In the Cave of Elephanta,
in India, over the head of the principal figure may be seen the
cross, with other symbols."
Upon the breast of one of the Egyptian mummies
in the museum of the London University is a cross upon a Calvary
or mount. People in those countries marked their sacred water-jars,
dedicated to Canopus, with a Tau cross, and sometimes even that
now known as the Teutonic cross. The fertility of the country
about the river Nile, in Egypt, was designated, in distance on
its banks from the river proper, by the Nilometer, in the form
of a cross.
The erudite Dr. G. L. Ditson says: "The
Rabbins say that when Aaron was made High Priest he was marked
in the forehead by Moses with a cross in the shape of that now
known as Saint Andrew's. "
Proselytes, when admitted into the religious
mysteries of Eleusis, were marked with a cross
CROSSING THE RIVER
The Cabalists have an alphabet so called,
in allusion to the crossing of the river Euphrates by the Jews
on their return from Babylon to Jerusalem to rebuild the Temple.
It has been adopted in some of the advanced Degrees which refer
to that incident. Cornelius Agrippa gives a copy of the alphabet
in his Occult Philosophy.
CROSS-LEGGED KNIGHTS
In the Middle Ages it was the custom to
bury the body of a Knight Templar with one leg crossed over the
other; and on any monuments in the churches of Europe, the effigies
of these knights are to be found, often in England, of a diminutive
size, with the legs placed in this position. The cross-legged
posture was not confined to the Templars, but was appropriated
to all persons who had assumed the cross and taken a vow to fight
in defense of the Christian religion. The posture, of course,
alluded to the position of the Lord while on the cross.
CROSS-LEGGED MASONS
A name given to the Knights Templar, who,
in the sixteenth century, united themselves with the Masonic Lodge
at Sterling, in Scotland. The allusion is evidently to the funeral
posture of the Templars, so that a cross-legged Mason must have
been at the time synonymous with a Masonic Knight Templar.
CROTONA
One of the most prominent cities of the
Greek colonists in Southern Italy, where, in the sixth century,
Pythagoras established his celebrated school. As the early Masonic
writers were fond of citing Pythagoras as a Brother of their Craft,
Crotona became connected with the history of Freemasonry, and
was often spoken of as one of the most renowned seats of the Institution.
Thus, in the Leland Manuscript, whose authenticity is now, however,
doubted, it is said that Pythagoras "framed a grate Lodge
at Groton, and made many Maconnes," in which sentence Groton,
it must be remarked, is an evident corruption of Crotona.
CROW
An iron implement used to raise heavy stones.
It is one of the working tools of a Royal Arch Mason, and symbolically
teaches him to raise his thoughts above the corrupting influence
of worldly-mindedness.
CROWN
A portion of Masonic regalia worn by officers
who represent a king, more especially King Solomon. In Ancient
Craft Freemasonry, however, the crown is frequently displaced
by the hat.
CROWN, KNIGHT OF THE
See Knight of the Crown
CROWN, PRINCESSES OF THE
The French phrase is Princesses de la Couronne.
A species of androgynous or female Freemasonry established in
Saxony in 1770 (see Thory, Acta Latomorum 1, 303). It existed
for only a brief period.
CROWNED MARTYRS
See Four Crowned Martyrs
CROWNING OF MASONRY
The French expression is Le couronnement
de la Maçonnerie. The Sixty-first Degree, seventh series,
of the collection of the Metropolitan Chapter of France (see Thory,
Acta Latomorum 1, 303).
CROWNS
As the result of considerable classification,
Brother Robert Macoy presents nine principal crowns recognized
in heraldry and symbolism:
1. The Triumphal Crown, of which there were three kinds---a laurel
wreath, worn by a General while in the act of triumph; a golden
Crown, in imitation of laurel leaves ; and the presentation golden
Crown to a conquering General.
2. The Blockade Crown of wild flowers and grass, presented by
the army to the Commander breaking and relieving a siege.
3. The Civic Crown of oak leaves, presented to a soldier who saved
the life of his comrade.
4. The Olive Crown, conferred upon the soldiery or commander who
consummated a triumph.
5. The Mural Crown, which rewarded the soldier who first sealed
the wall of a besieged city.
6. The Naval Crown, presented to the Admiral who won a naval victory.
7. The Vallary Crown, or circlet of gold, bestowed on that soldier
who first surmounted the stockade and forced an entrance into
the enemy's camp.
8. The Ovation Crown, or chaplet of myrtle, awarded to a General
who had destroyed a despised enemy and thus obtained the honor
of an ovation.
9. The Eastern or Radiated Crown, a golden circle set with projecting
rays.
The crown of Darius, used in Red Cross knighthood and in the Sixteenth
Degree, Scottish Rite, was one of seven points, the central front
projection being more prominent than the other six in size and
height.
CRUCEFIX, ROBERT T.
An English Freemason, distinguished for
his services to the Craft. Robert Thomas Crucefix, M.D., I. D.,
was born in Holborn, England, in the year 1797, and received his
education at Merchant Tailors' School. After leaving school, he
became the pupil of Doctor Chamberlayne, a general and celebrated
practitioner of his day, at Clerkenwell; he afterward became a
student at Saint Bartholomew's Hospital and was a pupil of the
celebrated Abernathy.
On receiving his diploma as a member of
the Royal College of Surgeons, in 1810, he went out to India,
where he remained but a short time; upon his return he settled
in London, and he continued to reside there till the year 1845,
when he removed to Milton-on-Thames, where he spent the rest of
his life till within a few weeks before his decease, when he removed,
for the benefit of his declining health, to Bath, where he expired
February 25, 1850.
Doctor Crucefix was initiated into Freemasonry
in 1829, and during the greater part of his life discharged the
duties of important offices in the Grand Lodge of England, of
which he was a Junior Grand Deacon in 1836, and in several subordinate
Lodges, Chapters, and Encampments. He was an earnest promoter
of all the Masonic charities of England, of one of which, the
Asylum for Aged and Decrepit Freemasons, he was the founder. In
1834 he established the Freemasons Quarterly Review, and continued
to edit it for six years, during which period he contributed many
valuable articles to its pages.
Brother Mackey says that in 1840, through
the machinations of his enemies, for he was too great a man not
to have had some, he incurred the displeasure of the ruling powers;
and on charges which, undoubtedly, were not sustained by sufficient
evidence, he was suspended by the Grand Lodge for six months,
and retired from active Masonic life. But he never lost the respect
of the Craft, nor the affection of the leading Freemasons who
were his contemporaries. On his restoration, he again began to
labor in behalf of the Institution, and spent his last days in
advancing its interests.
The belief of Brother Mackey was founded
upon evidence that however satisfactory to him is not wholly in
agreement with that given by Brother Hawkins, whose account in
his Concise Cyclopedia of Freemasonry (page 60), is as follows:
Brother Crucefix set on foot a movement
in favor of a charity for Aged Freemasons; he advocated the erection
of an asylum, while others urged that a system of annuities was
a preferable scheme. The matter was keenly discussed for several
years, and at a meeting on November 13, 1839, at which Doctor
Crucefix was presiding some intemperate language was employed,
as to which a complaint was made to the Board of General Purposes,
and Crucefix was suspended for six months for not having checked
the speakers; his suspension was confirmed at a Grand Lodge in
June, 1840, and he then wrote a vehement letter to the Grand Master
and published it in the Freemasons' Quarterly Review with many
improper editorial observations; the letter was laid before the
Board of General Purposes, and he was summoned to show cause at
a Special Grand Lodge why he should not be expelled from the Craft;
accordingly, on October 30, he attended and made a very humble
apology, which was accepted. Doctor Crucefix died in 1850, in
which year also the Asylum and Annuity Funds for Aged Freemasons
and their Widows were amalgamated.
To his character, his long-tried friend,
the venerable Oliver, pays this tribute:
Doctor Crucefix did not pretend to infallibility, and , like
all other public men he might be sometimes wrong ; but his errors
were not from the heart, and always leaned to the side of virtue
and beneficence. He toiled incessantly for the benefit of his
Brethren, and was anxious that all inestimable blessings should
be conveyed by Freemasonry on mankind. In sickness or in health
he was ever found at his post, and his sympathy was the most active
in behalf of the destitute brother, the widow, and the orphan.
His perseverance never flagged for a moment; and he acted as though
he had made up his mind to live and die in obedience to the calls
of duty.
CRUCIFIX
A cross with the image of the Savior suspended
on it. A part of the furniture of a Commandery of Knights Templar
and of a Chapter of Princes of Rose Croix.
CRUDELI, DOCTOR
Master of the Lodge at Florence, Italy,
victim of the Inquisition, arrested in 1739, in Florence, on the
charge of having held a Masonic Lodge in his house in spite of
the Roman Catholic edict against Freemasons. He was tortured ans
sentenced to a long imprisonment. The Grand Lodge of England transmitted
to him twenty pounds to provide the necessities of life, and exerted
every effort toward securing his liberation, which they succeeded
in doing in December of that year (see Roman Catholicism and Freemasonry,
Dudley Wright, London, 1922, page 27).
CRUSADES
There was between Freemasonry and the Crusades
a much more intimate relation than has generally been supposed.
In the first place, the communications frequently established
by the Crusaders, and especially the Knights Templar, with the
Saracens, led to the acquisition, by the former, of many of the
dogmas of the secret societies of the East, such as the Essenes,
the Assassins, and the Druses.
These were brought. by. the knights to Europe,
and subsequently, as was believed by Brother Mackey, on the establishment
by Ramsay and his contemporaries and immediate successors of Templar
Freemasonry, were incorporated into the high degrees, and still
exhibit their influence. Indeed, it is scarcely to be doubted
that many of these degrees were invented with a special reference
to the events which occurred in Syria and Palestine. Thus, for
instance, the Scottish Degree of Knights of the East and West
must have originally alluded, as its name imports, to the legend
which teaches a division of the Freemasons after the Temple was
finished, when the Craft dispersed, a part remaining in Palestine,
as the Assideans, whom Lawrie, citing Scaliger, calls the Knights
of the Temple of Jerusalem, and another part passing over into
Europe, whence they returned on the breaking out of the Crusades.
This, of course, is but a legend, yet the
influence is felt in the invention of the advanced Degrees rituals.
But the influence of the Crusades on the Freemasons and the architecture
of the Middle Ages is of a more historical character. In 1836,
Westmacott, in a course of lectures on art before the Royal Academy,
remarked that the two principal causes which materially tended
to assist the restoration of literature and the arts in Europe
were Freemasonry and the Crusades.
The adventurers, he said, who returned from
the Holy Land brought back some ideas of various improvements,
particularly in architecture, and, along with these, a strong
desire to erect castellated, ecclesiastical and palatial edifices,
to display the taste they had acquired; and in less than a century
from the first crusade about six hundred buildings of the above
description had been erected in Southern and Western Europe. This
taste was spread into almost all countries by the establishment
of the Fraternity of Freemasons, who, it appears, had, under some
peculiar form of brotherhood, existed for an immemorial period
in Syria and other parts of the East, from whence some bands of
them migrated to Europe, and after a time a great efflux of these
ingenious men-Italian, German, French, Spanish, etc.-had spread
themselves in communities through all civilized Europe; and in
all countries where they settled we find the same style of architecture
from that period, but differing in some points of treatment, as
suited the climate.
CRUX ANSATA
This signifies, in Latin, the cross with
a handle. It is formed by a Tau cross surmounted by a circle or,
more properly, an oval. It was one of the most significant of
the symbols of the ancient Egyptians, and is depicted repeatedly
on their monuments borne in the hands of their deities, and especially
Phtha. Among them it was the symbol of life, and with that meaning
it has been introduced into some of the advanced Degrees of Freemasonry.
The Crux Ansata, surrounded by a serpent
in a circle, is the symbol of immortality, because the cross was
the symbol of life, and the serpent of eternity.
CRYPT
From the Greek, Ke meaning to hide. A concealed
place, or subterranean vault. The caves, or cells underground,
in which the primitive Christians celebrated their secret worship,
were called cryptae; and the vaults beneath our modern churches
receive the name of crypts. The existence of crypts or vaults
under the Temple of Solomon is testified to by the earliest as
well as by the most recent topographers of Jerusalem. Their connection
with the legendary history of Freemasonry is more fully noticed
under the head of Vault, Secret.
CRYPTIC DEGREES
The degrees of Royal and Select Master.
Some modern ritualists have added to the list the Degree of Super-excellent
Master ; but this, although now often conferred in a Cryptic Council,
is not really a Cryptic Degree, since its legend has no connection
with the crypt or secret vault.
CRYPTIC FREEMASONRY
That division of the Masonic system which
is directed to the investigation and cultivation of the Cryptic
Degrees. It is, literally, the Freemasonry of the Secret Vault.
CTEIS
Greek, Ke". The female personification
of the productive principle. It generally accompanied the phallus,
as the Indian yoni did the lingam; and as a symbol of the prolific
powers of nature, was extensively venerated by the nations of
antiquity (see Phallic Worship).
CUBA
The Historia de la Masoneria Cubana by Ricards
A. Byrne, quoted freely in Symbolisme, November, 1925, and translated
by us for the Builder, April, 1926, page 115, indicated that an
Irish military Lodge was working at Havana from 1762. The 1798
insurrection drove some French Brethren to Santiago de Cuba from
Santo Domingo where Lodges existed since 1748. These immigrants
erected Lodges, Perseverance and Concord, Friendship and Benevolent
Concord, in 1802 and 1803. Next year the Lodge Le Temple des Virtus
Theologales was instituted at Havana by the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania
but the Franco-Spanish War in 1809 forced the French to leave
for Louisiana.
On March 27, 1818, a Grand Lodge was organized,
and April 2, General Louis de Clonet, a Frenchman, founded at
Havana a Grand Consistory, Princes of the Royal Secret. But Masonic
progress was hindered in 1823 by the arrest and execution of many
Brethren, victims of the bloody persecutions ordered by Ferdinand
VII. Masonic meetings were forbidden and only allowed after many
years, in 1859. Again the War of Independence exposed Freemasonry
once more to the attacks of the authorities and it survived in
secret to resume open freedom on March 26, 1899, through intervention
by the United States. Lodges resumed labor, others were organized,
and the Gran Logia de la Isla de Cuba, founded in 1859, of which
Brother Byme has been Grand Master, thrived accordingly. There
is also recorded by the Annual an Oriental Grand Lodge, dating
from 1921, with headquarters at Santiago de Cuba but this is not
mentioned in the data credited to Brother Byrne.
CUBICAL STONE
This symbol is called by the French Freemasons
pierre cubique, and by the German, cubik stein. It is the Perfect
Ashlar of the English and American systems (see Ashlar).
CUBIT
A measure of length, originally denoting
the distance from the elbow to the extremity of the middle finger,
or the fourth part of a well-proportioned man's stature. The Hebrew
cubit, according to Bishop Cumberland, was twenty-one inches ;
but only eighteen according to other authorities. There were two
kinds of cubits, the sacred and profane---the former equal to
thirty-six, and the latter to eighteen inches. It is by the common
cubit that the dimension of the various parts of the Temple are
to be computed.
Hastings Dictionary of the Bible (page 967)
declares that ''we have at present no means of ascertaining the
exact dimensions of the Hebrews ordinary and royal cubits. The
balance of evidence is certainly in favor of a fairly close approximation
to the Egyptian system." This being the case, we may take
the common cubit as 17.52 inches and the royal cubit as 20.67
inches as in the Egyptian system of measurements, these dimensions
being taken from actual measuring rods. Hastings points out a
curious result of the Rabbinical tradition being subjected to
scientific experiment, the traditional dimension being that a
cubit equaled so many grains of barley. This number, 144 of grains
of barley of medium size were laid side by side carefully and
measured as accurately as possible, the result being 17.77 inches
long or equal in length substantially to the Egyptian common cubit.
Another suggestion that has been offered
is that Josephus when giving Jewish measures, which differ from
the Greek or Roman, is usually careful to explain that fact to
his readers, but this he does not do in the case of the cubit,
thus arousing a conviction that he regarded the Roman and the
Hebrew as the same, the Roman Attic cubit being 17.57 inches according
to Hastings. But it is well to remember that we are dealing with
a period in which handbreadths and finger spans were probably
the common units of length, and the decimal parts of inches and
perhaps the inches themselves mentioned in the above comments
need to be deemed mere approximations, an average sort of survey
of a situation not likely to have had in the ancient times any
close accuracy about it.
CULDEES
When Saint Augustine came over, about the
beginning of the sixth century, to Britain, for the purpose of
converting the natives to Christianity, he found the country already
occupied by a Body of priests and their disciples, who were distinguished
for the pure and simple apostolic religion which they professed.
These were the Culdees, a name said by some to be derived from
Cultores Dei, or worshipers of God ; but by others, with perhaps
more plausibility, from the Gaelic, Cuildich, which means a secluded
corner, and evidently alludes to their recluse mode of life. The
Culdees are said to have come over into Britain with the Roman
legions; and thus it has been conjectured that these primitive
Christians were in some way connected with the Roman Colleges
of Architects, blanches of which Body, it is well known, everywhere
accompanied the legionary armies of the empire.
The chief seat of the Culdees was in the
island of Iona, where Saint Culumba, coming out of Ireland, with
twelve Brethren, in the year 563 A.D., established their principal
monastery. At Avernethy, the capital of the kingdom of the Picts,
they founded another in the year 600 A.D., and subsequently other
principal seats at Dunkeld, St. Andrew's, Brechin, Dunblane, Dunfermline,
Kirkaldy, Melrose, and many other places in Scotland.
A writer in the London Freemasons Quarterly
Review (1842, page 36) says they were little solicitous to raise
architectural structures, but sought chiefly to civilize and socialize
mankind by imparting to them the knowledge of those pure principles
which they taught in their Lodges. Lenning and Gädieke, however,
both state that the Culdees had organized within themselves, and
as a part of their social system, Corporations of Builders; and
that they exercised the architectural art in the construction
of many sacred edifices in Scotland, Ireland, and Wales, and even
in other countries of Northern. Europe. Gädicke also claims
that the York Constitutions of the tenth century were derived
from them. But neither of these German lexicographers has furnished
us With authorities upon which these statements are founded. It
is, however, undeniable, that Masonic writers have always claimed
that there was a connection---it might be only a mythical one---between
these apostolic Christians and the early Freemasonry of Ireland
and Scotland. The Culdees were opposed and persecuted by the adherents
ofi Saint Augustine, and were eventually extinguished in Scotland.
But their complete suppression did not take place until about
the fourteenth century.
CUMBERLAND, HENRY F., DUKE OF
Grand Master of England, 1782-90, being
initiated in 1767. He was only brother of King George III.
CUMULATION OF RITES
The practice by a Lodge of two or more Rites,
as the American or York and the Ancient Accepted Scottish, or
the Scottish and French Modern Rites. This accumulation of Rites
has been practiced to a considerable extent in France, and in
Louisiana in the United States. The word comes from the Latin
comulus, a heap.
CUNNING
Used by old English writers in the sense
of skillful. Thus, in First Kings (vii, 14), it is said of the
architect who was sent by the King of Tyre to assist King Solomon
in the construction of his Temple, that he was "cunning to
work all works in brass.''
CUP OF BITTERNESS
The French expression is Calice d'Amertume.
A ceremony in the First Degree of the French Rite. It is a symbol
of the misfortunes and sorrows that assail us in the voyage of
life, and which we are taught to support with calmness and resignation.
CURETES
Priests of ancient Crete, whose mysteries
were celebrated in honor of the Mother of the Gods, and bore,
therefore, some resemblance to the Eleusinian Rites. The neophyte
was initiated in a cave, where he remained closely confined for
thrice nine days. Porphyry tells us that Pythagoras repaired to
Crete to receive initiation into their rites.
CURIOSITY
It is a very general opinion among Freemasons
that a candidate should not be actuated by curiosity in seeking
admission into the Order. But, in fact, there is no regulation
nor landmark on the subject, An idle curiosity is, it is true,
the characteristic of a weak mind. But to be influenced by a laudable
curiosity to penetrate the mysteries of an Institution venerable
for its antiquity and its universality, is to be controlled by
a motive which is not reprehensible, an impulse to be esteemed
and welcomed. There are, indeed, in legends of the advanced degrees,
some instances where curiosity is condemned; but the curiosity,
in these instances, led to an intrusion into forbidden places,
and is very different from the curiosity or desire for knowledge
which leads a profane to seek fairly and openly an acquaintance
with mysteries which he has already learned to respect.
CURIOUS
The Latin word is curious, from cura, meaning
care. An archaic expression for careful. Thus in Masonic language,
which abounds in archaisms, an evidence, indeed, of its antiquity,
Hiram Abif is described as a curious and cunning workman, that
is to say, careful and skillful.
CUSTOMS, ANCIENT
See Usages
CYNOCEPHALUS
The figure of a man with the head of a dog.
A very general and important hieroglyphic among the ancient Egyptians.
It was with them a symbol of the sun and moon; and in their mysteries
they taught that it had indicated to Isis the place where the
Body of Osiris lay concealed. The possessor of the advanced Degrees
of Freemasonry will be familiar with the symbol of a dog, which
is used in those Degrees because that animal is said to have pointed
out on a certain occasion an important secret.
Hence the figure of a dog is sometimes found
engraved among the symbols on old Masonic diplomas.
CYRUS
Cyrus, King of Persia, was a great conqueror,
and after having reduced nearly all Asia, he crossed the Euphrates,
and laid siege to Babylon, which he took by diverting the course
of the river which ran through it. The Jews, who had been carried
away by Nebuchadnezzar on the destruction of the Temple, were
then remaining as captives in Babylon. These Cyrus released 3466
AM., or 538 B.C., and sent back to Jerusalem to rebuild the house
of God, under the care of Joshua, Zerubbabel, and Haggai.
Hence, from this connection of Cyrus with
the history of Freemasonry, he plays an important part in the
rituals of many of the advanced Degrees. But from late discoveries
of inscriptions pertaining to Cyrus as mentioned in the excellent
little London work called Fresh Light from the Ancient Monuments
(pages 166-86), A. H. Sayce, M.A., it would appear that this king
was a polytheist, and that he was not a king of Persia, although
he acquired that country after his Conquest of Asiyages, 559 B.C.,
between the sixth and ninth years of Nabonidos. Cyrus was king
of Elam. The empire he founded was not a Persian one; Darius,
the son of Hystaspes, at a subsequent period, was the real founder
of that kingdom. Professor Sayce continues: ''It was only as the
predecessor of Darius, and for the sake of intelligibility. to
the readers of a later day, that Cyrus could be called a king
of Persia" (see Ezra1, 2).
The original words of his proclamation ''King
of Elam,'' have been changed into the more familiar and intelligible
"King of Persia." Elsewhere in the Bible (Isaiah xxi,
1-10), when the invasion of Babylon is described, there is no
mention of Persia, only of Elam and Media, the ancestral dominions
of Cyrus. This is in strict accordance with the revelations of
the monuments, and testifies to the accuracy of the Old Testament
records.
Cyrus Dever besieged Babylon, a city fifteen
miles square. It opened its gates to his general without battle,
538 B.C. The description by Herodotus belongs to the reign of
Darius. Bosanquet asserts that the Darius of the Book of Daniel
is Darius the son of Hystaspes.
Cyrus had learned that a disaffected conquer
people imported into a kingdom was a constantly menace and danger,
and he returned the Jewish exiles to Jerusalem to rebuild their
city and be a fortress and check upon Egypt. The nations which
had been brought from East and West were restored to their lands
along with their gods. So it was with the captives of Judah. His
dominions extended from the Hellespont almost to India. Cyrus
was a worshiper of Merodach, originally the Sun-god, who is mentioned
and intended by the name Bel, and Nebo, his prophet (see Isaiah
xlvi, 1). His first act after acquiring Babylonia was to restore
the Babylonian gods to their shrines, from which they has been
removed by Nabonidos, and further asks for their intercession.
The theory that Cyrus believed in but one supreme god---Ormudz-must
be abandoned. God consecrated Cyrus to be His instrument in restoring
His chosen people to their land, not because the King of Elam
was a monotheist, but because the period of prophecy, "ten
weeks of years,'' was closing. These statements are made upon
the authority of the three inscriptions among the clay documents
lately discovered in Babylonia by Rassam, and translated by Sir
Henry Rawlinson and Pinches. The first of these is a cylinder,
inscribed by order of Cyrus ; the second a tablet, which describes
the conquest of Babylonia by Cyrus; while the third is an account
given by Nabonidos of his restoration of the temple of the Moon-god
at Haran, and of the temples of the sun-god and of Anunit at Sepharvaim.
Cyrus ascended the throne 559 B.C., and
was slain in battle against the Massagetae, 529 B.C. He was followed
by Cambyses, his son, until 521 B.C., when he was succeeded by
Smerdis, a Magian usurper, who reigned sev CZECHO-SLOVAKIA. en
months. Darius I, son of Hystaspes, a nobleman, conspired with
six others and murdered Smerdis, when, by device, Darius obtained
the throne over his companions, 521 B.C. The celebrated siege
of Babylon lasted two years; the city finally succumbed to the
strategy of General Zopyrus, in the year 516.
Darius reigned 36 years, died 485 B.C. This
article is mainly due to the industrious researches of Brother
Charles T. McClenachan to whom the subject made an especial appeal
(see also Zendavesta).
Previous
|
Next
A |
A2 |
A3 |
B |
B2 |
C |
C2 |
C3 |
D |
E |
E2 |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L
M |
M2 |
N |
O |
P |
P2 |
Q |
R |
S |
S2 |
S3 |
T |
T2 |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z
|